Balkan power play: why the Western Balkans must ditch Russian fuels and fast-track EU market integration
A short, sharp truth: the Western Balkans sits at the crossroads of Europe’s energy security and its green ambitions, but patchy rules, lingering dependence on Russian fuels and slow market reforms mean the region risks being a weak link rather than a bridge. A new working paper from Bruegel lays out what’s at stake and what needs to happen next.
From leverage to liability: Russian ties still matter
The report finds that several Western Balkan states remain exposed to Russian energy influence notably Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina on oil and gas which leaves them vulnerable to geopolitical pressure and imported price shocks. Negotiations and occasional extensions of Russian contracts in 2024–25 underline that diversification on paper does not always mean real independence. That dependence isn’t just political theatre: it alters investment choices, weakens bargaining power and complicates alignment with EU rules.
Why this matters beyond the region: the Western Balkans is a major transit corridor for electricity between the EU and Southeast Europe. The paper highlights that as much as “up to 70%” of electricity flows tied to the region actually pass between EU countries a signal that grid interdependence already exists and that isolation is neither realistic nor desirable. Faster regulatory alignment and market coupling would therefore strengthen European system resilience as well as the region’s.
Market coupling: planned, stalled, urgent
European market coupling the technical and regulatory merging of power markets is the single policy lever that could deliver immediate gains: better price signals, more efficient dispatch across borders, and a buffer against supply shocks. The Bruegel authors point out that integration planned for the mid-2020s (originally aiming around 2027) is running behind because national rulebooks and market institutions in the Western Balkans are not yet aligned with EU standards. That delay has real costs: lost efficiency, higher system operation expenses, and a slower rollout of renewables.
Uneven green progress leaders and laggards
Not all Western Balkan countries are on the same page when it comes to the green transition. The paper singles out Albania as a regional leader largely because of its hydropower legacy and relatively favorable renewables policies and Montenegro as advanced across several indicators. Meanwhile, solar and wind potential across much of the region remains largely untapped and constrained by underdeveloped grids, weak permitting frameworks and scarcity of private investment. Simply put: the natural resource advantage (sun, wind, hydro) is mostly unexploited.
This mix of actors creates both a challenge and an opportunity. Countries with stronger renewables backbones could become exporters and stabilizers for neighbors but only if cross-border trade is enabled and market rules are harmonised.
Coal’s long shadow political economy vs. emissions
Phasing out coal is politically charged across the Western Balkans. Coal still provides baseload power and jobs in several countries, and switching it off without credible compensation or alternative industrial plans risks social backlash. The paper recommends phased, socially sensitive coal retirement plans tied to clear investment pathways for renewables and grid upgrades. In short: decarbonisation must be realistic and sequenced fast where possible, compensated where needed.
Practical steps the paper recommends (and why policymakers should care)
-
Accelerate regulatory alignment with the EU. Aligning rules is the low-hanging fruit that unlocks market coupling and immediate efficiency gains. Market reforms are technical, but the payoff — lower costs and stronger security — is political and strategic.
-
Reduce real dependence on Russian fuels. Diversification must go beyond headline contracts. It requires investments in LNG connections, alternative import routes, and faster roll-out of domestic renewables to reduce import vulnerability.
-
Design a just coal phase-out. Pair plant retirement timetables with retraining, economic revitalisation, and clean-energy investment envelopes so communities are not left behind.
-
Mobilise private capital for renewables and grids. Improve permitting, de-risk projects with public guarantees, and create transparent auction frameworks to attract the investors the region needs.
Political and financial headwinds plus a window of opportunity
The paper is candid about constraints: weak institutions, fragmented markets, and geopolitical tensions complicate reform. But it also notes a narrow window where EU enlargement dynamics, conditional funding instruments (the EU Growth Plan for the Western Balkans) and post-Ukraine energy policy realignments create momentum and conditional financing that can be leveraged if countries move quickly and coherently.
What success looks like
A successful pathway would see the Western Balkans converge with EU market rules, complete market coupling, significantly reduce Russian fuel exposure, and scale renewables deployment while phasing out coal with social protections. Practically, that means lower wholesale price volatility, better utilisation of regional transmission assets, and an energy sector that attracts investment rather than fears it.
Conclusion integration first, transition faster
The Bruegel working paper’s central message is straightforward: the Western Balkans has the geographic and resource advantages to be a strategic partner for Europe’s energy security and green goals but only if the political will to align rules, diversify supplies and invest in renewables is found. Fast-tracking market coupling and decarbonisation in parallel, not in sequence will deliver both security and economic opportunity. For policymakers in Tirana, Sarajevo, Pristina, Podgorica, Skopje and Belgrade, the choice is clear: remain a transit corridor vulnerable to outside influence, or become a resilient, integrated bridge to Europe’s clean-energy future.

















