AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Main
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • News
  • EventsEvents
  • PublicationPublication
  • Contact Us
AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Main
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • News
  • EventsEvents
  • PublicationPublication
  • Contact Us
AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Home Page
  • About Us
  • Sectors
  • Our Services
  • News
  • Contact Us
July 10, 2015
by AEA in News

Albania’s GDP grows 2.82 pct in first quarter of 2015

tirana14* Albania GDP grows 2.82 pct in first quarter of 2015

* Financial sector and manufacturing boost growth

(Reuters) – Albania’s economy grew 2.82 percent in the first quarter of 2015 from the same period a year before, shrugging off the impact of February floods as activity in the financial and insurance sector surged.

The Institute of Statistics also said on Thursday that gross domestic product had grown 0.32 percent in the first quarter of 2015 from the last three months of 2014.

That was in line with official forecasts for growth in 2015 despite damage to agriculture from flooding in the south of the Adriatic Sea state in February.

Last week, Albania and the International Monetary Fund cut their growth forecast to 2.7 percent from 3 percent for 2015, mainly because of lower prices in world markets for Albania’s exports of minerals and oil.

The central bank expects the economy to expand more in 2015 than 2014’s 1.89 percent although that could change if the crisis in neighbouring Greece, home to more than 600,000 Albanian migrant workers, worsens.

The financial and insurance sector led growth in the first quarter, expanding by 13 percent compared to the same period last year, with activity in the manufacturing, energy and water industries 7.64 percent higher.

Household spending fell by 1.22 percent while government expenditure fell by 0.01 percent, the Institute said.

July 10, 2015
by AEA in News

Gas Pipeline Web Sought to Reduce Russia’s Grip on EU Supplies

slovakia-zero_1217690cEuropean officials on Friday will take a step toward creating a web of natural gas pipelines across the region’s southeast as a way to reduce the threat of Russia choking off supplies.

Some 17 nations, more than half of them from the former Soviet bloc, will endorse an action plan to improve energy infrastructure and ultimately to ensure each of them maintain three separate sources of supply. The decision is due at a meeting of ministers in Dubrovnik, Croatia, with Maros Sefcovic, the European Commission’s vice president in charge of energy union.

The crisis in Ukraine along with Russia’s decision in December to cancel a $45 billion pipeline to Europe shocked nations from Austria to Bulgaria. The commission wants to encourage them to work together on protecting energy supply. Russia supplies 27 percent of the gas that feeds the European Union, which imports more than half its energy needs.

 

“There are still considerable bottlenecks and constraints in the market that make it more difficult to move alternative sources of supply around the market and cut dependence on Russia,” said Emily Stromquist, an energy analyst at the Eurasia research group in London.

European Commissioner Miguel Arias Canete, who oversees climate and energy, will join the discussions that build on a strategy outlined in February, according to his office in Brussels.

Nations Gathered

European Union nations at the talks include Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia. Those outside the union are Serbia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Republic of Kosovo, Montenegro, Moldova and Ukraine.

South-eastern Europe is a vital part of the political jigsaw to diversify supply away from Russia. The countries in the region stand between energy-hungry markets of Western Europe and gas fields around the Caspian Sea owned by Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan.

Next year, a venture that includes BP Plc and Statoil ASA plans to start work on the Trans Adriatic Pipeline, which will help to ship Azeri natural gas to Italy, Greece, Albania and Bulgaria.

The South Stream project scrapped in December would have piped gas under the Black Sea to Europe. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s alternative is building a pipeline to Turkey and then shipping gas overland to Greece.

European Plan

The EU strategy is to make gas supplies more flexible by building additional pipelines across the southeast. So long as gas can flow both ways in each of the pipelines, that would fill gaps in the network and make the system more resilient to cutoffs.

Commission officials proposed a high-level group of ministers to discuss strengthening the gas network two months after Putin canceled South Stream.

A handful of projects already are on the drawing board. The Slovak transmission operator Eustream AS has a plan to boost transit from Slovakia to south-eastern Europe through Romania. That pipeline, with a working name Eastring, could be connected to the Turkish link via Bulgaria, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said earlier this year.

Several countries also are pushing for a “Vertical Gas Corridor,” which would link Romania, Bulgaria and Greece. It would involve inter-connectors between Bulgaria and Greece and between Romania and Bulgaria.

Ministers at the talks in Dubrovnik will choose several infrastructure projects that need to be sped up. They may be eligible for financial aid from the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the EU. Investors hope that officials will agree “very concrete decisions and timelines,” according to Stromquist.

“These aren’t typically very high cost projects but their impact is considerable,” she said. “Getting additional inter-connectors into the market will certainly help improve competition and reduce Russian dependence.”

July 9, 2015
by AEA in News

Mott MacDonald wins projects in Singapore and Albania

mott-macdonald-advertUK-headquartered consultancy Mott MacDonald has announced two major international environmental contract wins.

Firstly, it has been appointed to investigate the impacts of climate change on Singapore’s energy and telecommunication infrastructure. The appointment by the country’s National Environment Agency falls within the second phase of the Singapore Government’s Second National Climate Change Study, which in the first phase has already looked at climate projections for the country and the wider region up to 2100.

During the second phase, Mott MacDonald will be helping the country understand the impacts of climate change in a range of areas, including water resources and drainage, biodiversity and greenery, network infrastructure and building infrastructure, whilst recommending adaptation measures and strategies for energy and telecommunication network infrastructure and operations.

Mott MacDonald project director, Chris Preston, commented: “Singapore has been hit by several cases of extreme weather in recent years, including floods in 2013 and a dry spell in 2014. Our research will contribute towards efforts to protect the country from future extreme weather events. Mott MacDonald was appointed on this project on the basis of the team’s technical quality of methodology and their careful consideration of the challenges involved in the project, particularly surrounding model uncertainty.”

The consultancy is also set to provide technical advisory services to improve the efficiency of water resources management in the Drini-Buna and Seman rivers in Albania.

Appointed by the Albanian Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Water Administration, Mott MacDonald will be assessing availability and demand of water resources, surface and groundwater quality, and the status of the current infrastructure as part of the the river basin management plans project which is being funded by the World Bank. The findings will be used to compile priority water resources management plans and development interventions.

July 7, 2015
by AEA in News

TAP begins construction of access roads and bridges in Albania

TAP_route_Albania_EN_rgb_672x430Construction and rehabilitation work on access roads and bridges along the pipeline’s route in Albania has begun. The Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG (TAP) hosted an inauguration ceremony near Çorovoda, attended by the Prime Minister of Albania, Edi Rama, Minister of Energy and Industry, Damian Gjiknuri, and Managing Director at TAP, Ian Bradshaw, to mark this occasion.

Construction and rehabilitation of roads and bridges

Expected to be complete in 2016, TAP will construct and rehabilitate approximately 100 km of road along the pipeline’s route, and build three new bridges whilst rehabilitating over 40 existing bridges in the regions of Korçë, Berat and Fier.

Construction is critical for TAP’s progress and economic growth in Albania

Prime Minister Rama and Minister Gjiknuri emphasized the importance of the project to Albania when speaking to an audience that included foreign diplomats, members of the Albanian parliament, representatives of local authorities and other key stakeholders.

TAP Managing Director, Ian Bradshaw, said: “TAP aims to build a modern pipeline that will safely deliver Caspian gas to Europe in early 2020. The construction of access roads and bridges in Albania is critical to our project’s progress.” He added: “The rehabilitated roads and bridges will contribute not only to the modernization of the transport infrastructure but also to transport safety. They will boost access to markets and services, thus contributing to the long-term economic growth of many Albanian regions.”

July 7, 2015
by AEA in News

Germany lends Albania 106 mln euros ahead of Merkel visit

Chancellor Angela Merkel* Germany lends Albania 106 million euros for power, water

* Deals signed before visit by German Chancellor Angela Merkel

TIRANA, July 6 – Germany lent Albania 106 million euros on Monday to back the country’s cash-strapped utilities, fund small and medium-size enterprises and bring water to rural areas.

The agreements were signed by ministers of Albania’s coalition government and Germany’s ambassador before a visit by Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday.

At the weekend, Merkel urged the western Balkan states of Albania, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina to build greater political stability, to smooth their path to membership in the European Union. She will visit all three countries this week.

Her visit also comes after debt-ridden Greece voted against accepting a bailout on terms imposed by its creditors. Greek banks are active throughout the Balkans, and fears have been growing that the debt crisis could spread in the Balkans.

However, an International Monetary Fund team said last week Greece’s troubles were unlikely to spill into Albania. Three units of Greek banks controlled 15.9 percent of total assets in Albania in 2014, but unlike Macedonia and Serbia, Albania has not restricted capital transactions with Greece.

“Today is a good day … After years of preparation, we signed six important financial cooperation deals,” German Ambassador Helmut Hoffmann said after the signing.

“This creates an excellent atmosphere on the eve of the visit after two days of the Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel. Hundreds of thousands of Albanians gain from these projects.”

Most of the funds from Germany will fund the electricity sector, with 40 million euros ($44 million)going to the KESH monopoly power producer and 20 million euros for the security of hydro power dams.

Albanian Finance Minister Shkelqim Cani said Germany had helped Albania since 1988 – two years before the Iron Curtain fell – with more than 1 billion euros in aid, including its European Union and United Nations contributions.

On Sunday, Hoffmann commemorated with Albanian villagers the massacre of 107 people in eastern Albania by the German Army in World War Two in retaliation for a partisan attack, saying every German felt ashamed.

(Reuters)

June 24, 2015
by AEA in News

Global Oil&Gas: Black Sea & Mediterranean Exhibition and Conference 2015

728x90Developing and maximising upstream prospects in Black Sea and Mediterranean oil and gas projects – Overcoming technical challenges for success

The Global Oil&Gas: Black Sea & Mediterranean Exhibition and Conference is officially supported by the Greek Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change, and will focus on the latest hydrocarbons activity and developments in the Black Sea, East Med, Ionian and Aegean Seas. 5 Ministries of Energy, 6 national oil and gas companies and 28 international speakers have already confirmed their participation. 
 

View the official Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change support letter
 

Major discoveries of natural gas in the Eastern Med have the potential to significantly alter supply and demand dynamics scenarios in the region, whilst renewed upstream interest in the development of exciting new resources offshore in the Black Sea could also radically shift the energy outlook in South Eastern Europe and beyond. Regionally, energy demands could not only be met but major exports also achieved – if developments north and south of the Bosphorus prove commercially successful. 

With new tendering opportunities available, and regional governments keen to attract new investments and hydrocarbons infrastructure, these are exciting times for those seeking to develop and monetise resources in these two pivotal, emerging energy regions. 

The 2015 programme focuses on essential issues impacting developments and investments, including:

  • Understanding the commercial and strategic landscape in these two emerging regions
  • Dedicated NOC and Government speakers with senior representation from: Greece, Turkey, Albania, Cyprus, Georgia, Crimea, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya
  • Future prospects and upcoming licensing rounds revealed 
  • The fundamental obstacles to overcome when developing deep and ultra-deepwater assets 
  • Technological challenges facing operators and upstream contractors 
  • Monetising and delivering hydrocarbons successfully to market: Infrastructure, pipelines, LNG, CNG
  • Unique and insightful examination of the upstream prospects within the south-eastern European energy corridor 
  • All-encompassing coverage of the entire value chain: With operators, project developers, oilfield services, governments, advisers and more all speaking

Register now

June 19, 2015
by AEA in News

Albania Delays with one more Month the Onshore Oil Blocks

As it was made know in previous (mid May 2015) the AKBN in behalf of the Albanian Ministry of Energy invited all interested hydrocarbon companies, to apply for:

– Free onshore blocks: Block 4, Block 5 and Block of Dumre with the deadline of application for the 15th of June 2015 (MEI order nr.124 12.05.2015).

– For free offshore blocks: Joni 5 and Rodoni as well as onshore block C and Panaja with the deadline of application for the 25th of June 2015 (MEI order nr. 132 date 15.05.2015).

A week before open of the offers for the onshore bids Energy Minister Damian Gjiknuri ordered the bidding date to be postponed for another month to give companies more time. Now bidders have until July 15 to express their interest for blocks 4, 3, Dumre, C and 4 onshore.

Albanian Oil BlocksSource: Lorenc Gordani |Thursday, June 18, 2015

June 19, 2015
by AEA in News

Russia, Greece sign deal on Turkish Stream gas pipeline

Russia and Greece have signed a deal to create a joint enterprise for construction of the Turkish Stream pipeline across Greek territory, Russian Energy Minister Aleksandr Novak said. The pipeline will have a capacity of 47 billion cubic meters a year.

The Greek extension of the Turkish Stream project is called the South European pipeline in the memorandum signed on Friday, Novak said at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum. Construction will start in 2016 and be completed by 2019.

The two countries will have equal shares in the company, Novak added.Construction of the pipeline in Greece will be financed by Russia, and Athens will return the money afterward.

Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis said the Friday meeting was“historical “.

“The pipeline will connect not only Greece and Russia, but also the peoples of Europe,” Lafazanis was quoted as saying by Sputnik news agency. “Our message is a message of stability and friendship… The pipeline we are beginning today is not against anyone in Europe or anyone else, it is a pipeline for peace, stability in the whole region.”

turkish_stream_final

Source : rt.com

June 5, 2015
by AEA in News

Southeast Europe can lead the way in clean energy

At the end of 2014, Silicon Valley’s Progress Software Corporation acquired the Bulgarian software start-up Telerik for $262.5m, a huge amount for the EU’s poorest country. Two months later, Bulgaria’s large Varna coal power plant owned by the Czech energy company CEZ closed because it could not comply with EU environmental standards and remain competitive. These events highlight a battle of generations in southeast Europe.

The region, which can be defined as including up to 18 countries, from Turkey to Italy, has 220m people and covers 2m sq km. Most of the states are entangled in a tug of war between past and future. The struggle stretches from the interpretation of history to industrial policies.

The old guard is pulling back. Governments dream of re-industrialisation, generally understood as the revival of inefficient Communist-era industries. Most countries cling to the idea of becoming regional energy centres. Whether that means building more power plants than the neighbours or hosting more pipelines, the dream survives government and regime changes, wars, EU entries and the turn of a century.

The dream is catalysed by Moscow’s strategies to sell nuclear power plants and to penetrate the EU’s gas market through southeast Europe in order to suppress alternative gas projects that could squeeze Russia’s market position.Centuries of struggle to create national identities are not helping either. To have an independent energy supply is often seen as strategic priority.

Meanwhile, the clean energy sector is growing fast. With plenty of sunshine, good wind conditions and abundant hydro resources, southeast Europe has great renewable energy potential. Romania has the largest onshore wind power plant in Europe and in 2012, Bulgaria installed more solar power per capita than any other country in the world. Both have already reached their EU 2020 renewables targets. Albania is one of the two European countries with almost 100 per cent renewable electricity; the other is Norway.

The IT sector is also booming. Management consultancy AT Kearney’s 2014 Global Services Location Index ranks Bulgaria as the best outsourcing destination in Europe and ninth in the world. A recent analysis of Stack Overflow, a popular coders’ online community, placed Bulgaria in a leading position with the highest average reputation among top users in the world. Croatia is in fifth position. Romania and Bulgaria regularly feature in the top 10 countries with the fastest internet speeds.

Clean energy and IT go well together. The future of energy will depend on intelligent systems — from smart meters to complex demand management and regional power markets. Italy was the first country to install smart meters in almost all households. Austria is the first European state to launch a smart meter solution linking the energy and telecoms sectors. The two old EU members play a significant role in a region where they are successful investors.

However, there is a big difference between energy and IT. While IT is predominantly entrepreneurial and independent of the state, energy is dependent on politics, regulation and regional co-operation. None of these work in favour of the entrepreneurial potential of the Balkans. The Energy Union process might help. The European Commission recognised southeast Europe as a region with high energy efficiency and renewables potential that needs urgent action. It also branded it as vulnerable and started a drive to make the energy sector more transparent.

Until recently, southeast Europe was treated primarily as a gas corridor — a simplistic view that ignores the vulnerability of the region and its economic and renewable energy potential. The region can position itself as a champion of clean energy and new technology, boosting the economy and security while making a significant contribution to European competitiveness and climate goals.

If the Balkan countries step back from their old dreams of energy supremacy and act with more transparency and entrepreneurial spirit, they could leapfrog into the future of interconnected, clean and efficient energy use.

Source FT.Com – Julian Popov is a former Bulgarian minister of the environment.

May 19, 2015
by AEA in News, Publication

THE POTENTIAL FOR BIOMASS ENERGY IN THREE ALBANIAN REGIONS

Biomass combustion is among the oldest and the most mature technique for conversion of biomass to energy, but still a great challenge lies ahead in developing new, more efficient and environmentally sustainable -systems. In light of the European Action and the National Strategy in the energy sector, Albania has enacted a friendly policy regarding renewable energy sources, including biomass. Execution of such projects is delegated to both regional and local authorities for various technical, economic and socio-environmental considerations as well as for an integrated approach to the land use planning. This paper identifies the main sources of biomass energy in three different regions of Albania i.e. Korça, Tirana and Vlora. It shows the weight of each possibility on the total potential for energy production by biomass as well as the type and distribution of each biomass. The manner how the potential offered by forestry, agriculture and agro-industry would be utilized will, apart from availability of appropriate technology, also depend on the ability of economic operators to organize themselves efficiently while respecting environmental sustainability.

Introduction

Utilization of agricultural residues is becoming an important issue in the sustainability of certain agricultural industries and in satisfying the social and environmental expectations as well as governmental regulations [1]. Agricultural residues and crops are important renewable resources that can partly replace nonrenewable sources of energy, and perhaps, can lead to the reverse of continued growth of fossil fuel consumption [2, 3]. Indeed, in the countries where the arable land ratio to population is very low, agriculture can play a complementary role since its main function is supply food sources which are indispensable to an ever growing population. This is the topic of an increasing worldwide scientific debate involving the main international organizations who express grave concern and dissent over the designation of agricultural products for energy purposes [4]. The World Energy Outlook 2006 (www.IEA.org) specifies that the world will have to face two energy-related threats: the first one being the lack of adequate and secure supplies of energy at affordable prices, and the second of environmental harm caused by consuming too much of it. Hence, it is clear that sustainable and efficient biomass production must not proceed on valuable arable land but should primarily focus on the so far neglected and abandoned plots. This means that solutions have to be proposed for lands that have been neglected and/or abandoned, e.g. because they may be degraded, polluted or non-exploited, relatively poor soils [5]. Similarly, the EREC [6] suggests that adopting the targets for bio energy will be the basis for the continuation of a sustainable EU energy policy, as well as a precondition for establishing a sustainable, competitive and secure energy mix for the future.

The main types of useable biomass material to produce electric and/or thermal energy include residue from agricultural activity (cereal chaff, branches from trees, seeds, berries, vine shoots, etc.), wood obtained after tending and maintenance of woods, agro-industrial residues (exhausted olive residue, peel, shells, stones, chaff and husks, etc.) destined for energy and/or fuel production, and lastly, industrial and civil waste, animal waste and the organic fraction of solid urban waste. In these cases biomass is obtained at the same time as the main product, but its direct use for energy purposes often presents real difficulties, such as the possibility of competitive use, wide dispersion throughout the territory and the lack of economic and organizational conditions for collection, storage and transformation.

The biomass derivate form agricultural activities is calculated using the harvest index (HI) which is defined as the ratio between economic yield and total biomass. A number of sources and publications exists dealing with these aspects, but data vary significantly. These calculations are concentrated mainly in Residue-to-Product Ratio [7, 8, 9], crop outputs, and the ratio of grain production to stalk mass [2], the proportion of product to residue or “waste factor” [10]

and the residue-yield ratio (t ha-1) [11]. The amounts of annually generated agricultural residues are normally calculated based on the annual average area of hectares harvested, yield values per hectare, and estimated residue generation factors [12, 13].

The Albanian Energy Strategy supports the development of small-scale energy facilities, especially those based on residues from the wood processing industries and agricultural activities, which are considered an important alternative energy source [8]. The use of electric energy for warm water and the heating of public buildings is a heavy burden to the Albanian energy sector, whose main source is based on hydro and oil. Agricultural residues in Albania could, to a certain extent, substitute the use of high-price energy, especially at the local level where they have insignificant market value and very low transport cost, and by utilizing simple and low cost equipment (e.g. boilers). Residues of cereal straw and of olives from the olive oil production industry are substantial in Albania. Furthermore, the planting of new olive trees (about 10 million new olive trees planted in the last five years) would further encourage the use of residues from this industry.

This study provides an overview of the most important trends of biomass energy production and conversion technologies in Albania, which in turn might influence the major agricultural and forest sector development policies. Furthermore, policy proposal are prepared amongst others for research and development activities, the establishment of demonstration sites, as well as for extension of educational activities in Albania. This paper instigates identification for the biomass capacities on the regions of Vlora, Tirana and Korça, which are the main regions for the production of olives and cereals on the national level, and analyzes the economic feasibility of using the wheat straw and the olive oil residues as alternative energy solution.

  1. Methodology

The study was structured in two main stages: Resource Evaluation and Availability, and Technology Analysis for the optimal biomass energy valorization. The methodology has been applied to a representative geographical area of Mediterranean climate and with typical biomass resources for this climate, where a considerable part of the total area is assigned to agricultural, industrial and urban use. In order to evaluate the different types, quantities, and uses of biomasses, three prefectures were studied, namely Vlora Tirana and Korca. The following districts or townships were selected in those three prefectures: Vlora, Saranda, Tirana, Korca, Devoll, and Kolonja. Thus, in Vlora prefecture have been selected two districts out of three, in Tirana one of two, while in Korca have been selected all the three districts. The selection was based of their special features in annual production plan of biomass. In the prefecture of Vlora and Tirana, the products from olives were analyzed in detail, as that was the most important energetic source of biomass. The products of agricultural crops and fruit-culture were analyzed in Korca, while in Devoll the focus was on the production of biomass from agricultural crops and in Kolonja the production of biomass from forest and forest industry.

This methodology included the collection of general information regarding to cartographic (mapping of agricultural areas, type of crops, forest areas, industrial activities, etc.) and statistical data for each municipality (population, types of dwelling, services, industries, etc.), biomass characterization, dispersion and seasonality analysis of the resources.

During the resource evaluation phase, agricultural and forestry data was collected and organized into a database structured in municipalities. Information gathered included:

  • Data concerning biomass resources including crop types and biomass residues,
  • Topography of the soil and possible management of the potential biomass residues.
  • Information concerning agricultural as well as wood, agro alimentary and other industries activities.
  • Cartographic data from the area of study (municipalities, area distribution: urban, industrial, agricultural, forests).
  • Data related to accessibility and road transport network.
  • Data on population, economy and socio-cultural environment.
  1. Results and Discussion 3.1 Forestry biomass

Biomass can be classified into eight categories: natural forest woodlands, forest plantations, agro­industrial plantations, tree outside forests and woodlands, agricultural crops, crop residues, proceed residues and animal wastes [14, 15]. This work focused mainly on the assessment of residual biomasses such as forestry, wood industry residues, agricultural residues, agro industry residues on the first phase and on the most efficiency identified biomass in the second phase. In the districts taken in consideration, in the first place for the wooden surfaces is Korca with about 54,000 ha of forests and bushes; in the second is Tirana with 48,000 ha of forests and then Kolonja with 35,000 ha of forests (Table 1). The districts of Vlora, Saranda and Kavaja have limited forestry areas. On the other side, it should be emphasized that the important parts of those surfaces are strictly protected zones or National Parks; they are 34%, 20% and 35% for Tirana, Vlora and Korça regions, respectively.

Surface, type and annual production of forests in the studied regions

3.2 Woody residues evaluation

In Albania there is a net of industries of wood sawing and wood elaboration for domestic furniture. Although an important part of wood matter comes from the import, competing with the quality and prices, there is a considerable consume of the country wood. In Tirana, differently from the two other districts, the wood manufactures generally use imported wood matter, but the wood remnants are used as biomass in industry or in other simple thermal processes. The quantities of elaborated wood vary from 18,000 m3 year-1 in the district of Vlora to 54,000 m3 year-1 in the district of Tirana (Table 2). Their annual remnants (in forms of saw-dust, unsuitable wood or chips of wood) in tons of equivalent diesel are: 1000-2600 and 8700 tons/year for Vlora and Tirana respectively. Compared to the energetic surplus obtained from the annual growth of forest biomass these quantities are 4, 3.7, and 12 % of it in the districts of Vlora, Korça and Tirana respectively.

Table 2. Annual wood processing manufactured and their residues

Table 2. Annual wood processing manufactured and their residues

The positive thing about this kind of biomass is that the cost is very low and consists on the packing, conditioning and transport. On the other hand, the fact that they are produced in the urban areas with high density of population makes its use as energetic matter more attractive because those have often energetic sources deficits.

Another important biomass source derived from the orchards. The potentially usable biomass is smaller than the total biomass, because a part of remnants of prunes, are burned from the farmers for different purposes as cooking and/or warming. According the data provided form INSTAT [16], it turns out that the potential biomass in Albania, calculated for the main agricultural cultures is about 457 000 tons for year, while the biomass of zoological origin is about 10.5 million tons (2005). It is clear that not all the quantity of biomass can be used. The biomass of fruit trees is more important in the district of Korca with about 20 000 tons year-1, followed from Tirana and Vlora with 17 000 tons year-1 and then Saranda about 7000 tons year-1. Kolonja produces 3000 tons year-1 which is very low compared to the forest biomass produced in this district. The thermal energy produced by these biomasses comes in the same rank. The fruit cultures that dominate this biomass depend on the climate areas; in Korca the quantities of biomass are totally dedicated to the fruit trees and vineyards. These occupy greater areas in Korca than in the other districts of the study. In Vlora and Saranda the biomasses originate mainly from olive trees, while in Tirana the sources of biomass are the fruit and olive trees.

3.3 Herbaceous residues

The quantities of agricultural harvest residues included as herbaceous are presented at Table 3. They are separated in tow category: (i) the residues coming from cereals and (ii) from other plant where mostly vegetables residues are. Korca region have greater than other; they are higher than Tirana (48000 v.s 3500 ton year-1) and much higher than Vlora (4800 v.s 19000 ton year-1). The residues at Tirana are dominated from vegetables while at Korça form cereals. Compared with wood residues the herbaceous residues are several times larger in quantity.

Table 3. The estimated herbaceous residues (in tons)

Table 3

They can be locally used for the warming of water or public premises, but do not constitute an important source for use in energetic centrals of whatever dimension because: (i) the space in which these remnants are produced is very wide and it is not near to urban centers, excluding the field of Korca where can be used in the cities of Maliq and Korca; (ii) in the mountainous and hilly areas (Tirana, Devoll, Sarande, and Vlore), the greatest part of reed is used for the needs of farmers families (food source for the equines) and (iii) even if remains a considerable quantity of this biomass in the mentioned districts, the transport would increase the costs in an unaffordable way for its energetic utilization.

3.4 Oil olive processing industry residues

In tow regions (Tirana and Vlora) an important source of energy was identified; the residues after the oil olive production (Table 4). The olive remnants which are present in the western part of the country are energetic sources that are not used or used too title. Furthermore they have become a problem for the elaborators who continuously need to eliminate them. Currently their use consists on the energetic supply for the elaboration manufactures. This is important because the olive residues have an energy of about 17 000 KJ kg-1 which is a considerable energetic value. In these conditions, the olive residues represent an important energetic alternative for the supply of the consumers, private (restaurants etc) or public (schools, kindergartens etc), in either their unelaborated form or elaborated one (with high density units). In our area of study this energetic possibility belongs only to the western districts (Tirana, Vlora, and Saranda), which are the most important producers of olive in the country.

Table 4 Quantities of olive production and residues of olive in our study area

table4

The main country producer of olive is Vlora, because of its localization and climate which optimize the production of olive. Although the amount of waste from olive oil production compared to other categories of waste is less high energy value makes it more efficient to the energy production. The figure below is built taking in considering the same level of elaboration for all the administrative units inside the region that are studied. The map clearly shows that the district of Vlora is the most important producer, followed from Saranda and at the end is placed Tirana.

Figure 1

This level of production implies an important energetic level, which is used to little, or not used at all. The main problems that the use of this energetic source has:

  • The transformation sources are small or very small and although they have an acceptable level of mechanization, are not able to elaborate more than 80 tons per year and the residues offered from one unit are low. Beside the costs of transport, there is also the cost of transaction to obtain a considerable quantity of residues in order to supply a consumer continuously.
  • The production of olive in our country follows a high periodicity; e.g. during the last three years, the production reduced more than 60 % in 2007, and there was an increase in 2006 compared to 2005.

Another element that makes difficult the utilization of olive residues as an alternative energetic mean is also the lack of the tradition in the use of this source and the investments that are requested. Currently in our country there are very few units that are specialized for offering the suitable technology and the necessary services for the olive elaboration remnants [17]. The relatively low prices of other energetic sources (mainly the wood for combustion) has postponed this process, but the continuous growth of the price of electric energy, petrol, gas and its derivates as a result of the international prices growth and a low transparency of markets and national operators, has directed the attention of the consumers towards the alternative sources of energy. In these conditions, it is create the possibility for the utilization of these sources for warming or in place of wood matter. The main positive element in the use of olive residues is that these residues can be used without using extra costs, making easier their utilization.

3.5 The potential energy biomass

Converting all potential biomasses (expressed in Gwh year-1) result that the district with the highest level of energy is the Korca, while the districts with the lowest level are the districts of Kolonja and Devoll (211, 31.2 and 32.5, respectively). The other districts beside Vlora have a yearly capacity that varies from 50 to 90 Gwh year-1, while Vlora, potentially,produces about 115.8 Gwh year-1, but these figures should be relativized as these districts have different surfaces. If we elaborate the figures according to the surfaces or inhabitants, we can note that the energetic production is much more different (Table 5).

Table 5It can be noted that differently from the total energetic level of the districts, it is the district of Kavaja that has the greatest energetic level for surface unit, while the district of Korca is placed in the middle group of districts. While the analysis of production for 1000 inhabitants shows that the district of Saranda has the greatest production together with Kolonja that had the lowest total energetic production. Another evident remark is that the district of Tirana has the lowest level of energetic production for surface unit and for inhabitants. From the ratio of energy and surface, we can note the most advantaged districts are those in which the energy from agricultural products (reed olives) predominates, while in the ratios of energy and inhabitants, the most productive districts are those that have great surfaces of forests (as a result of the low density of population). This analysis helps us to have a relative level of gross production.

Theoretically, the energetic sources structure according the regions and the districts is presented at Figure 2.
Figure2-1Figure 2-2

The data figured above shows that the source kind of energy generation is very different; they can classify the districts in three main groups: (i) district which energy is generated from the cereals reed (Korca, Kavaja, Devolli), (ii) districts which energy is generated from the olive residues (Saranda, Vlora) and (iii) the districts which energy is generated from remnants of wood elaboration (Tirana, Kolonja). Another interesting element is the diversity of kinds of biomass energy that exist inside the regional territory. Generally, the energy is produced from two kinds of sources, excluding Tirana where there is a more equal distribution between the three sources. This distribution firstly related to the agro-climatic features of the areas of our study. In the Table 6 it’s presented the diversity index of generation of energy. This index is the ratio between the energetic remount quantities from the adding of a source over the accumulated energetic quantity, where the energetic sources are listed from the most important to the less important. In the case of two sources the index is calculated according formula : D2 = P2 /(P1+P2) ,  while in the case of three products the formula is: D3 = P3 / (P1+P2+P3) .Table 6

The data elaborated indicates that the districts with the highest level of diversity are Tirana, Saranda, and Vlora, while those with the lowest are Korca, Kolonja and Devoll.

3.6 The economic efficiency of the use of alternative energetic sources

To compare the efficiency of each energetic source an economic analysis is develop. The utilization of these sources is related to the question if these are efficient and are able to complete the traditional energetic sources used in the country. For this analysis we are based on the costs of transport that these sources are related, in order to be used. Considering that all the sources that are studied (reed, olive residues, and sawdust) there are no alternative uses, than the cost of their purchase is equal to zero and the main element of the cost of their use, is the cost of transport from the site of their production (farms, saw installments or the olive elaboration manufactures). Not having references for the costs of transport of a product. The cost is calculated based on some suppositions. To calculate the level of expenses for one kilometer, is used the method of calculation proposed by Jojic in 2007 [19], for the use of means. Expressed in euro the cost per kilometer is 0.20 € km–1, while the invariable cost and variable cost are 0.17 and 0.03 € km-1, respectively. The cost values shows that the transport costs are not a problem in the use of electric energy and at any case, their use (whenever the initial and technology costs are equal to zero) is more efficient than the use of electric energy. In our analysis we have not taken in consideration the unreliability of the supply with electric energy and the costs of transactions of alternative energy, which would complete our analysis.

  1. Conclusions

Biomass from woods, agriculture and food industry residues such as olive oil and wine production, were used since a long time by people in Albania. Natural resource depletion as a result of human needs and higher urban pressure as well as the need for environmental protection both compel for application of efficient technologies to utilize residues as a sustainable solution to environmental preservation and alternative energy. The survey shows that albeit in small quantities, there are biomass sources for alternative energy which could efficiently be used in small-scale energy production facilities. The residues from the olive oil production industry seem a viable source of alternative energy for Saranda and Vlora regions. Due to the high energy value, combined with very low transport cost and insignificant market value offered by the olive oil production plants, the use of such residues is a feasible efficient alternative for energy production, heating of public buildings, or other needs of the population. Apart of the economic benefits, it also helps with removal of waste from inappropriate dumping practices.

  • 1
  • …
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • …
  • 140

AEA – Albania Energy Association is a industry association dedicated to representing the interests of Albanian and West Balkan for energy producers and consumers. AEA works to advance the development and adoption of sustainable energy solutions in Albania and the Western Balkans, supporting the region’s transition toward a cleaner, more secure, and more competitive energy future. AEA is registered by decision of the Court of Tirana, DECISION NO. 3032, (VAT:L11827451K).

[email protected]

Address
Blv Zogu 1
Tirana
1057
ALBANIA

LinkedIn  |  Facebook
Events
May 25, 2022 Connecting Green Hydrogen Europe 2022
May 25, 2022 Energy Week Western Balkans 2022
Copyright © Albania Energy Association