by in News

Greece outlines long-term investment plan to solve water crisis

The Greek government presented a plan to maintain water supply as drought has reduced reserves to worrying levels in certain areas.

The Ministry of Environment and Energy outlined short-term and long-term measures, with a focus on Attica, the peninsula where Athens is located. The area consumes by far the most water in Greece. This year, the level in the nearby Mornos lake in Fokida has dropped to just 152.9 million cubic meters, with its area reduced to 8.3 square kilometers. It marks a 15-year low for the major reservoir and a steep 45% drop in reserves from 2024.

For the long term, the government has launched the Evrytos project for using water from the Evinos river in Aetolia-Acarnania. It will provide Attica with 220 million cubic meters annually, for a cost of EUR 500 million. Necessary infrastructure will become operational by 2029, according to Minister Stavros Papastavrou.

Desalination plants to increase power demand

In the meantime, the government and the Athens Water Supply and Sewerage Company (EYDAP) are examining the installation of three desalination plants: in Thisvi, Nea Peramos and Lavrion. Papastavrou said they can together provide 87.5 million cubic meters annually.

However, such units are both expensive and energy hungry. An average desalination plant consumes about 3.5 kWh of electricity for every cubic meter of water it produces. Therefore, the total for all three is about 600 GWh per year.

The new energy demand has not been anticipated in the ten year development plan of Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO or ADMIE) nor the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP). The 600 GWh is not much compared to a national consumption of 52 TWh, but it would be concentrated in Attica and needs to be taken into account.

Demand is already expected to rise in the region, as a result of electrification and new large-scale construction works in places like Ellinikon.

by in News

Serbia to put mining strategy to parliament vote

The government passed the draft Strategy for the Management of Mineral and Other Geological Resources of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2025 to 2040, with projections until 2050, so the National Assembly is required to put it to vote. With full appreciation of economic, environmental and social aspects, the implementation needs to contribute to improving the legal framework, establishing a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, remediation of abandoned mining facilities and securing a stable supply of critical and strategic raw materials, Minister of Mining and Energy Dubravka Đedović Handanović stressed.

After a turbulent public discussion process, the Government of Serbia adopted the draft Strategy for the Management of Mineral and Other Geological Resources of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2025 to 2040, with projections until 2050. Several dozen objections and suggestions were accepted or partly accepted. However, the text of the strategy that will be passed on to the National Assembly for a vote hasn’t been published yet.

A special emphasis is on the development of risk management mechanisms, climate neutrality and the application of energy-efficient and low-carbon technologies, the government pointed out.

The strategy is based on the principles of sustainable utilization of natural wealth, biodiversity protection, climate resilience and the reduction of negative effects of mining activities, the announcement reads.

According to the report on the environmental impact of the strategy’s implementation, Serbia hosts many deposits of metallic, non-metallic and energy raw materials, groundwaters and geothermal energy. The authors of the accompanying document acknowledged that the exploitation of mineral raw materials in Serbia caused air, water and land pollution. Metals mining hub of Bor and Majdanpek and the Kolubara and Kostolac lignite basins are the most affected.

Another challenge highlighted in the environmental impact report are the abandoned mines, tailings dumps and mining facilities that require remediation and rehabilitation.

Strengthening state’s role in planning, oversight

The document sets a long-term framework for the responsible management of mineral resources and the strengthening the role of the state in planning, oversight and the improvement of the sector of mining and geology, in the interest of citizens and a sustainable development of local communities, the Ministry of Mining and Energy said.

A special emphasis is on critical and strategic raw materials, geothermal energy and rational utilization of natural resources

Minister Dubravka Đedović Handanović said the strategy defines programs and measures directed toward a secure supply of domestic companies and the energy system with mineral raw materials, job creation and a greater participation of the domestic industry in the value chain, as well as for reducing import dependency and strengthening the country’s economic stability.

She explained that the focus is particularly on critical and strategic raw materials, geothermal energy and rational utilization of natural resources, alongside the implementation of high environmental and security standards. This is the way, in her words, to protect the environment, improve work safeety and lower the risks for people’s health and the quality of life in local communities.

Treating protected areas responsibly

Dubravka Đedović Handanović added that the strategy clearly defines a responsible treatment of protected areas and the spaces of special natural value, through a principle of prevention and respect toward the protection regime, as well as the transparency in the processes of planning and decision making, so that the citizens would be informed timely and included in dialogue.

With full appreciation of economic, environmental and social aspects, the implementation needs to contribute to improving the legal framework, establishing a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, remediation of abandoned mining facilities and securing a stable supply of critical and strategic raw materials, the minister underscored. She said that in the long term it meant greater safety, a better quality of life and responsible development.

by in News

Serbia to put mining strategy to parliament vote

The government passed the draft Strategy for the Management of Mineral and Other Geological Resources of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2025 to 2040, with projections until 2050, so the National Assembly is required to put it to vote. With full appreciation of economic, environmental and social aspects, the implementation needs to contribute to improving the legal framework, establishing a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, remediation of abandoned mining facilities and securing a stable supply of critical and strategic raw materials, Minister of Mining and Energy Dubravka Đedović Handanović stressed.

After a turbulent public discussion process, the Government of Serbia adopted the draft Strategy for the Management of Mineral and Other Geological Resources of the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2025 to 2040, with projections until 2050. Several dozen objections and suggestions were accepted or partly accepted. However, the text of the strategy that will be passed on to the National Assembly for a vote hasn’t been published yet.

A special emphasis is on the development of risk management mechanisms, climate neutrality and the application of energy-efficient and low-carbon technologies, the government pointed out.

The strategy is based on the principles of sustainable utilization of natural wealth, biodiversity protection, climate resilience and the reduction of negative effects of mining activities, the announcement reads.

According to the report on the environmental impact of the strategy’s implementation, Serbia hosts many deposits of metallic, non-metallic and energy raw materials, groundwaters and geothermal energy. The authors of the accompanying document acknowledged that the exploitation of mineral raw materials in Serbia caused air, water and land pollution. Metals mining hub of Bor and Majdanpek and the Kolubara and Kostolac lignite basins are the most affected.

Another challenge highlighted in the environmental impact report are the abandoned mines, tailings dumps and mining facilities that require remediation and rehabilitation.

Strengthening state’s role in planning, oversight

The document sets a long-term framework for the responsible management of mineral resources and the strengthening the role of the state in planning, oversight and the improvement of the sector of mining and geology, in the interest of citizens and a sustainable development of local communities, the Ministry of Mining and Energy said.

A special emphasis is on critical and strategic raw materials, geothermal energy and rational utilization of natural resources

Minister Dubravka Đedović Handanović said the strategy defines programs and measures directed toward a secure supply of domestic companies and the energy system with mineral raw materials, job creation and a greater participation of the domestic industry in the value chain, as well as for reducing import dependency and strengthening the country’s economic stability.

She explained that the focus is particularly on critical and strategic raw materials, geothermal energy and rational utilization of natural resources, alongside the implementation of high environmental and security standards. This is the way, in her words, to protect the environment, improve work safeety and lower the risks for people’s health and the quality of life in local communities.

Treating protected areas responsibly

Dubravka Đedović Handanović added that the strategy clearly defines a responsible treatment of protected areas and the spaces of special natural value, through a principle of prevention and respect toward the protection regime, as well as the transparency in the processes of planning and decision making, so that the citizens would be informed timely and included in dialogue.

With full appreciation of economic, environmental and social aspects, the implementation needs to contribute to improving the legal framework, establishing a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, remediation of abandoned mining facilities and securing a stable supply of critical and strategic raw materials, the minister underscored. She said that in the long term it meant greater safety, a better quality of life and responsible development.

by in News

Major industrial polluters in Serbia continue to pollute air, soil, water without control

Around 150 companies in Serbia, potentially major polluters of water, air, and soil, have not obtained their integrated pollution prevention and control permits by December 31, 2024. It means they are violating the Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control and, more importantly, that no one controls how much they pollute the environment, according to the analysis of the basic premises of the Draft Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, produced by the Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute (RERI).

About 220 operators are required to own an integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) permit for their industrial and intensive agricultural facilities, such as power plants, oil refineries, large chemical and metal facilities, as well as farms.

Ones that haven’t fulfilled their legal obligation include large and profitable companies such as power utility Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS) and Serbia Zijin Copper.

The Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control has been in force since 2004. Its aim was to introduce integrated pollution prevention and control, as well as to transpose the European Union’s Industrial Emissions Directive (IED).

The draft of the new law was recently published

The deadline for obtaining IPPC permits was initially the end of 2020, but it was then postponed to the end of 2024. The basic premises for the new law were published in February. The draft law, recently published as well, is in the public consultation phase.

Programme Director of RERI Mirko Popović stressed that citizens should be aware that there are major polluters and that they are the most profitable and wealthiest companies in Serbia. In his view, they are exempted from the application of the law, to the detriment of the citizens, because they pollute the environment – air, water, soil.

Popović: We want to protect people’s health, property, and rights

Citizens should be aware that when EPS emits 300,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2), it goes into the atmosphere and partially turns into fine particulate matter that pollutes the air and enters the lungs, Popović noted. Some of it becomes acid rain that falls on the soil, making agricultural land less fertile, he added.

“Citizens are obliged to pay taxes, to obey the law, but these polluters aren’t,” Popović pointed out.

According to RERI’s programme director, citizens should know that RERI, an NGO dealing with these problems, doesn’t want to eliminate jobs, close factories, or hinder development.

“We want to protect the health, property, and rights of people,” Popović underscored.

Minić: Pollution reduces economic growth in the long term

serbia ippc permits reri report law
Photo: RERI

When a company has an IPPC permit, it means that it is obliged to implement best available techniques (BAT) while its operations are monitored for comprehensive reduction of air, water, and soil pollution and for compliance with strict emission limit values.

When a company doesn’t have one, the environment is exposed to greater, uncontrolled pollution, since the law doesn’t apply to it.
The legislation stipulates strict emission limit values, defined maximum levels of pollutants, including heavy metals, SO2 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) that a facility is allowed to emit into the air, water, or soil.

Pollution has a negative impact on GDP

According to Slobodan Minić, Senior Economist at Fiscal Council, everything regarding the IPPC law is based on the paradigm that investing in BAT, or technologies that minimize harm to the environment and human health, increases costs and slows growth.

“However, it has been overcome in the world at least a decade ago, because as data on air and environmental pollution became available, more and more research has been conducted on how it affects health. The public in Serbia now knows well what the impact is, between 10,000 and 15,000 premature deaths annually. According to economic literature, pollution also adversely affects GDP,” he stated.

We must think of this not as a cost, but as an investment

He recalled that an OECD study showed that an increase in the average concentration of PM2.5 by one microgram reduces GDP by 0.98%.

“If we want to break out of this vicious circle, we must think of this not as a cost, but as an investment. Not just in the production facility, but in human capital, because it contributes to economic growth, instead of hindering it. Otherwise, in the long term, society and the economy will suffer,” Minić concluded.

Vojvodić: The initial principles do not promise changes in the new law

serbia ippc permits reri report law popovic vojvodic minic
Slobodan Minić, Mirko Popović and Hristina Vojvodić (photo: RERI)

Public consultations on the draft law, which began on November 27, last until December 15.

Hristina Vojvodić, legal advisor in RERI, pointed out that core problems aren’t addressed.

The basic premises of the draft law should have identified the shortcomings of the existing law, based on the 20 years of its implementation, in her view. It isn’t good that these premises were defined without the participation of the members of the working group for the draft law, she explained.

This is a signal to the public, experts, members of the working group that the problems that have been identified were sidelined, Vojvodić asserted.

Of note, RERI produces reports on the implementation of IPPC law to help reduce pollution originating from industry. The organization also defines recommendations for improving the enforcement of regulations and sanctions for polluters.

According to RERI, the research for the latest analysis went beyond the scope of the basic premises. It decided to expand the report to include the issues in the implementation of the law and offer fact-based solutions.

by in News

Major industrial polluters in Serbia continue to pollute air, soil, water without control

Around 150 companies in Serbia, potentially major polluters of water, air, and soil, have not obtained their integrated pollution prevention and control permits by December 31, 2024. It means they are violating the Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control and, more importantly, that no one controls how much they pollute the environment, according to the analysis of the basic premises of the Draft Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, produced by the Renewables and Environmental Regulatory Institute (RERI).

About 220 operators are required to own an integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) permit for their industrial and intensive agricultural facilities, such as power plants, oil refineries, large chemical and metal facilities, as well as farms.

Ones that haven’t fulfilled their legal obligation include large and profitable companies such as power utility Elektroprivreda Srbije (EPS) and Serbia Zijin Copper.

The Law on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control has been in force since 2004. Its aim was to introduce integrated pollution prevention and control, as well as to transpose the European Union’s Industrial Emissions Directive (IED).

The draft of the new law was recently published

The deadline for obtaining IPPC permits was initially the end of 2020, but it was then postponed to the end of 2024. The basic premises for the new law were published in February. The draft law, recently published as well, is in the public consultation phase.

Programme Director of RERI Mirko Popović stressed that citizens should be aware that there are major polluters and that they are the most profitable and wealthiest companies in Serbia. In his view, they are exempted from the application of the law, to the detriment of the citizens, because they pollute the environment – air, water, soil.

Popović: We want to protect people’s health, property, and rights

Citizens should be aware that when EPS emits 300,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2), it goes into the atmosphere and partially turns into fine particulate matter that pollutes the air and enters the lungs, Popović noted. Some of it becomes acid rain that falls on the soil, making agricultural land less fertile, he added.

“Citizens are obliged to pay taxes, to obey the law, but these polluters aren’t,” Popović pointed out.

According to RERI’s programme director, citizens should know that RERI, an NGO dealing with these problems, doesn’t want to eliminate jobs, close factories, or hinder development.

“We want to protect the health, property, and rights of people,” Popović underscored.

Minić: Pollution reduces economic growth in the long term

serbia ippc permits reri report law
Photo: RERI

When a company has an IPPC permit, it means that it is obliged to implement best available techniques (BAT) while its operations are monitored for comprehensive reduction of air, water, and soil pollution and for compliance with strict emission limit values.

When a company doesn’t have one, the environment is exposed to greater, uncontrolled pollution, since the law doesn’t apply to it.
The legislation stipulates strict emission limit values, defined maximum levels of pollutants, including heavy metals, SO2 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) that a facility is allowed to emit into the air, water, or soil.

Pollution has a negative impact on GDP

According to Slobodan Minić, Senior Economist at Fiscal Council, everything regarding the IPPC law is based on the paradigm that investing in BAT, or technologies that minimize harm to the environment and human health, increases costs and slows growth.

“However, it has been overcome in the world at least a decade ago, because as data on air and environmental pollution became available, more and more research has been conducted on how it affects health. The public in Serbia now knows well what the impact is, between 10,000 and 15,000 premature deaths annually. According to economic literature, pollution also adversely affects GDP,” he stated.

We must think of this not as a cost, but as an investment

He recalled that an OECD study showed that an increase in the average concentration of PM2.5 by one microgram reduces GDP by 0.98%.

“If we want to break out of this vicious circle, we must think of this not as a cost, but as an investment. Not just in the production facility, but in human capital, because it contributes to economic growth, instead of hindering it. Otherwise, in the long term, society and the economy will suffer,” Minić concluded.

Vojvodić: The initial principles do not promise changes in the new law

serbia ippc permits reri report law popovic vojvodic minic
Slobodan Minić, Mirko Popović and Hristina Vojvodić (photo: RERI)

Public consultations on the draft law, which began on November 27, last until December 15.

Hristina Vojvodić, legal advisor in RERI, pointed out that core problems aren’t addressed.

The basic premises of the draft law should have identified the shortcomings of the existing law, based on the 20 years of its implementation, in her view. It isn’t good that these premises were defined without the participation of the members of the working group for the draft law, she explained.

This is a signal to the public, experts, members of the working group that the problems that have been identified were sidelined, Vojvodić asserted.

Of note, RERI produces reports on the implementation of IPPC law to help reduce pollution originating from industry. The organization also defines recommendations for improving the enforcement of regulations and sanctions for polluters.

According to RERI, the research for the latest analysis went beyond the scope of the basic premises. It decided to expand the report to include the issues in the implementation of the law and offer fact-based solutions.

by in News

Tens of thousands of tons of waste motor oil unaccounted for in Serbia

Waste motor oil is classified as hazardous waste as it can contaminate soil, water, and air. Although Serbian regulations for its management are clear, tens of thousands of tons are unaccounted for every year. Auto repair shops, obliged to dispose of it, often sell the material to individuals who use it for heating. Burning used motor oil is extremely dangerous because of the release of substances similar to chemical warfare agents into the air, warns Dejan Lekić from the National Ecological Association.

Just one liter of used motor oil can pollute up to one million liters of drinking water, making it one of the most harmful pollutants.

UAS, a Serbian association of auto repair shops, pointed out after the public debate on the draft Law on Waste Management that Serbia does not need cosmetic legal changes, but solutions to prevent the country from being buried under all types of hazardous and non-hazardous waste.

According to the latest report by the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), about 40,311 tons of oil were placed on the Serbian market in 2023. Of the 40,311 tons, only 440 tons of waste motor oil were processed in Serbia, and 1,660 tons were exported. It means 38,000 tons likely ended up in soil, sewage systems, waterways, or household furnaces.

Burning waste motor oil releases toxic substances

Dejan Lekić from the National Ecological Association, the creator of the xEco app for real-time air pollution monitoring, warned that waste motor oil must never be used as fuel in household stoves, nor discharged into soil or sewage.

“The only correct approach is to collect it and hand it over to licensed operators. Once the operator takes it, the oil can follow two paths: regeneration or destruction. Ideally, it is regenerated – technologically purified to produce base oil for reuse,” he explained.

Waste oil can be regenerated or destroyed

Regenerating waste oil is an example of the circular economy. From one ton of crude oil, only 2% can be turned into base oil, while 65% of collected waste oil can be processed into base oil.

“The second option is using it as a fuel, but only in specialized industrial facilities such as cement plants, which have furnaces operating above 1,200 degrees Celsius and appropriate filtration systems. Such facilities are the only ones that can safely destroy hazardous substances and prevent their release into the atmosphere,” Lekić asserted.

Using waste oil as fuel in household stoves is extremely dangerous to health

As it is cheap and easily available, waste motor oil is often used for heating in Serbia. But when burned in ordinary stoves, it releases large amounts of carcinogenic gases and heavy metals. According to Dejan Lekić, using waste oil for heating poses a serious threat to human health.

He explained that waste motor oil contains heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, along with various additives. Regular stoves cannot reach temperatures high enough to burn these substances safely, so they are released directly into the air.

Lekić warned that incomplete combustion also produces extremely toxic compounds, including dioxins and furans – substances known to cause cancer and linked to severe neurological damage, hormonal disorders, and fertility problems. “People who burn this oil are literally releasing chemical warfare agents into their surroundings,” he said.

Serbia is among the top European countries in premature deaths caused by air pollution

Serbia is among the top European countries in premature deaths caused by air pollution, and it ranks first in Europe for lung cancer mortality linked to pollution, according to the World Health Organization. UAS, the Serbian group of car repair shops, described the situation as a “silent ecological catastrophe” that has been ongoing for decades and added that the system remains unable to stop it.

During the recent public debate on the new Law on Waste Management, the relevant ministry rejected most of the association’s proposals for managing waste oils. UAS emphasized that these suggestions were based on the best practices for reducing hazardous waste in the European Union and the region.

by in News

Greece outlines long-term investment plan to solve water crisis

The Greek government presented a plan to maintain water supply as drought has reduced reserves to worrying levels in certain areas.

The Ministry of Environment and Energy outlined short-term and long-term measures, with a focus on Attica, the peninsula where Athens is located. The area consumes by far the most water in Greece. This year, the level in the nearby Mornos lake in Fokida has dropped to just 152.9 million cubic meters, with its area reduced to 8.3 square kilometers. It marks a 15-year low for the major reservoir and a steep 45% drop in reserves from 2024.

For the long term, the government has launched the Evrytos project for using water from the Evinos river in Aetolia-Acarnania. It will provide Attica with 220 million cubic meters annually, for a cost of EUR 500 million. Necessary infrastructure will become operational by 2029, according to Minister Stavros Papastavrou.

Desalination plants to increase power demand

In the meantime, the government and the Athens Water Supply and Sewerage Company (EYDAP) are examining the installation of three desalination plants: in Thisvi, Nea Peramos and Lavrion. Papastavrou said they can together provide 87.5 million cubic meters annually.

However, such units are both expensive and energy hungry. An average desalination plant consumes about 3.5 kWh of electricity for every cubic meter of water it produces. Therefore, the total for all three is about 600 GWh per year.

The new energy demand has not been anticipated in the ten year development plan of Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO or ADMIE) nor the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP). The 600 GWh is not much compared to a national consumption of 52 TWh, but it would be concentrated in Attica and needs to be taken into account.

Demand is already expected to rise in the region, as a result of electrification and new large-scale construction works in places like Ellinikon.

by in News

Europe’s Environment 2025 report: Not good

Biodiversity is declining and water stress is affecting one third of Europe’s population and territory, while the frequency and magnitude of climate-related disasters are increasing. In short, this is the message from the report Europe’s Environment 2025.

​Europe’s Environment 2025 is the most comprehensive analysis on the current state and outlook for the continent’s environment, climate, and sustainability, building on data from across 38 countries, according to the European Environment Agency (EEA).

The outlook for most environmental trends is concerning and poses major risks to Europe’s economic prosperity, security, and quality of life, the authors warned. The agency said climate change and environmental degradation pose a direct threat to Europe’s competitiveness, pointing out that it depends on natural resources.

Progress on a range of factors that enable the shift towards sustainability – such as innovation, green employment, and sustainable finance – gives cause for hope, EEA added.

​More than 80% of protected habitats are in a poor or bad state

The report shows biodiversity is declining across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems in Europe due to persistent pressures driven by unsustainable production and consumption patterns, demonstrated most notably in the food system.

More than 80% of protected habitats are in a poor or bad state, with 60% to 70% of soils degraded, the document reads.

On a positive note, the extent of protected areas increased over the past decade – by 2022, 26.1% of the European Union’s land and 12.3% of its seas were protected. However, designating protected areas alone does not guarantee that biodiversity is effectively protected, the authors wrote.

​Water stress is affecting one third of Europe’s population and territory

The report’s findings point to severe pressure on water resources: water stress is affecting one third of Europe’s population and territory.

Only 37% of surface water bodies had a good or high ecological status in 2021, with the degradation of aquatic ecosystems threatening Europe’s water resilience. Agriculture is responsible for the most significant pressure on both surface and groundwater, data revealed.

EEA recalled that Europe is the fastest-warming continent on the planet.

Weather- and climate-related extremes caused economic losses of assets estimated at EUR 738 billion in the EU’s 27 member states over the period 1980-2023, with over EUR 162 billion in costs from 2021 to 2023 alone, the report reads.

Over 70,000 people in Europe are estimated to have died from heat in 2022.

The average annual economic losses in the 2020‑2023 period were 2.5 times as high as in the preceding decade, from 2010 to 2019, according to the report.

Downpours are increasing in severity, with several regions subject to catastrophic floods in recent years, while extreme heat, once rare, is becoming more frequent, with deadly consequences: over 70,000 people in Europe are estimated to have died from heat in 2022.

The greatest challenges call for a need to rethink the links between the economy and the natural environment, land, water and natural resources, EEA underscored.

“We cannot afford to lower our climate, environment and sustainability ambitions. Our state of environment report, co-created with 38 countries, clearly sets out the science-based knowledge and demonstrates why we need to act. In the European Union, we have the policies, the tools and the knowledge, and decades of experience in working together towards our sustainability goals. What we do today will shape our future,” EEA Executive Director Leena Ylä-Mononen said.

Bright spots

The report also highlighted the good results of environmental protection policies in Europe.

The EU has cut its domestic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 37% since 1990, largely driven by reducing fossil fuel use and doubling the share of renewables since 2005.

All member states have reduced their reliance on fossil fuels and shifted towards more sustainable energy sources over the last decade, while increased energy efficiency has brought down demand.

In 2023, renewable energy sources represented over 24% of the EU’s final energy use, a record high.

The bloc’s industrial system has managed to reduce emissions by more than 35% from 2005 to 2023, while emissions from buildings fell by more than 35% between 2005 and 2023.

Significant progress has been made in reducing pollution in Europe. EU policies led to improvements in air quality and reduced premature deaths attributable to fine particulate matter from 2005 to 2022 by 45%, according to the Europe’s Environment 2025 report.

by in News

EU reaches water pollution prevention deal but with deadlines of up to 20 years

The European Parliament and Council of the European Union agreed, after almost three years of negotiations, on updated rules regarding the pollution of surface and groundwater. However, the co-legislators left a timeline of up to two decades for member states to comply with some of the obligations.

The Danish presidency of the Council of the EU and the European Parliament’s representatives have reached a provisional political agreement on a directive to review and update the lists of pollutants affecting surface waters and groundwater and corresponding regulatory standards. Standards would be changed for several pollutants, and new substances added, aligning EU water policy with the latest scientific evidence.

Denmark’s Minister for Environment and Gender Equality Magnus Heunicke called the deal “a careful balance between ambition and flexibility for member states.” It safeguards the health of citizens and future generations by reducing exposure to harmful chemicals, he added.

It’s been almost three years since the European Commission proposed an update to the lists of pollutants.

Bisphenol A flagged as priority hazardous substance

New substances in priority lists would include pesticides, pharmaceuticals, bisphenols and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – PFAS, also known as forever chemicals. Member states would be required to improve the monitoring and transparency of water quality.

Bisphenol A or BPA was found in urine of 92% of urine samples in one study

Bisphenol A (BPA) is designated as a priority hazardous substance. A study published a few years ago showed that the chemical was found in urine samples of 92% of participants from 11 European countries.

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) already requires member states to prevent deterioration of the status of water bodies, but it was framed generally.

The deal envisages an exemption for short-term temporary deterioration, and another for cases where pollution is relocated, by moving water or sediment. There are safeguards, particularly in relation to drinking water, the council said.

Rules for some of more harmful substances to come into force by 2033

Member states will have until 2039 to achieve compliance with the new standards, but a “strictly conditioned extension” is also possible, until 2045. In the case of substances with revised and more stringent environmental quality standards in surface water, the deadline for compliance is 2033.

Member states will be required to transpose the directive by late December 2027.

The co-legislators outlined a 20-year deadline for phasing out priority hazardous substances. When the Council of the EU and European Parliament officially adopt the directive, it will enter into force. Member states would need to transpose it into national law by late December 2027.

In the EU, 46% of surface waters and 24% of groundwater don’t qualify for a good chemical status, and differences between member states are extreme, the announcement notes.

EEB: Member states managed to delay, weaken obligations

Commenting on the water pollution prevention deal, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) said member states have managed to delay and weaken obligations.

The lists of priority pollutants for surface and groundwater should be updated every six years, but the last updates were done in 2013 and 2014, respectively, it noted. In addition, EU-wide groundwater standards for pesticides and nitrates have not been revised since the adoption of the Groundwater Directive in 2006, the network of environmental groups pointed out.

“All over Europe, our waters are polluted with TFA, a small PFAS pesticide residue that can be toxic to reproduction. By not monitoring these substances immediately in all types of water bodies, the EU misses a significant opportunity to take water and health protection with the importance and urgency it requires,” said Manon Rouby from Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Europe.

The Council of the EU said that TFA, trifluoroacetic acid, would be added to the initially proposed sum of 24 PFAS for surface water.

by in News

Environmentalists warn EU that Bulgaria ignores coal plants breaching pollution rules

Greenpeace Bulgaria and Za Zemiata (For the Earth) said they would file a complaint today with the European Commission over repeated failures by Bulgarian authorities to enforce the European Union’s environmental law at four coal plants. They expressed the view that institutions are prioritizing financial interests over public health and the environment.

Environmental organizations Greenpeace Bulgaria and Za Zemiata wrote a complaint, to submit to the European Commission, regarding what they described as long-standing violations by four coal power plants linked to Bulgarian businessman Hristo Kovachki. “Bulgarian institutions refuse to apply EU environmental law as intended, favoring coal owners over people and nature. This complaint provides evidence for the European Commission to initiate infringement procedures,” said environmental lawyer Regina Stoilova.

Alleged breaches from 2018 to 2023 concern thermal power plants Bobov Dol in Golemo Selo, Brikel in Galabovo, Republika in Pernik, and Maritsa 3 in Dimitrovgrad. The two groups said they exhausted all national-level mechanisms for holding the polluters accountable and protecting affected citizens and the environment.

The two groups have exhausted all legal mechanisms on the national level

Instead of enforcing environmental standards, Bulgarian institutions – including the Ministry of Environment and Water, the Executive Environmental Agency and regional environmental and water inspectorates – have repeatedly issued permits to offenders, imposed weak or ineffective fines, and ignored serious pollution events that threaten public health, the environmentalists added.

“These coal plants are shielded by an institutional network protecting Kovachki’s opaque coal business. Thousands of Bulgarians living under these chimneys continue to face rampant pollution with no accountability,” said Director of Greenpeace Bulgaria Meglena Antonova.

Penalties could have been millions of euros higher

Bulgarian courts have also failed to act, according to the statement. During the legal proceedings after Brikel and Maritsa 3 were temporarily closed in 2022, the plants continued operating for three years. In the said six-year period, Kovachki-linked plants avoided nearly EUR 2.5 million in penalties, , the organizations calculated and stressed that Brikel payed only EUR 3,300 in fines.

In official documents, the businessman holds no ownership in most of the firms that media outlets regularly link him to. Kovachki has only identified himself as a consultant in some of them. Investigative journalists have obtained documents indicating that he controls a group of companies through a holding called Orion, which he denied.

Violations include illegal wastewater discharge

The violations of the permits consisted of illegal emissions into the air, illegal discharge of wastewater into rivers, and use of prohibited fuels.

“In an attempt to reduce production costs, the coal power plants associated with Kovachki have systematically co-fired waste and biomass with coal without possessing the necessary permits. Even after obtaining the required permits, the operators have significantly exceeded the biomass limits specified in them,” reads a report accompanying the announcement.

Meanwhile, the power plants have gained millions from saved carbon emission allowances, the document adds. An analysis by Za Zemiata estimates the damages for the period 2017-2021 at EUR 75 million for five plants associated with Kovachki, four of which are the subject of the new complaint.

Attack on activist living near Bobov Dol

“Not only has there been no accountability, but activists are also facing aggression for speaking out. Over the weekend, Daniela Toneva, an activist opposing the Bobov Dol TPP coal plant, was attacked after speaking out about the plant’s severe pollution and the links between Hristo Kovachki and the chairman of the Bobov Dol Municipal Council Krasimir Chavraganski,” said Beyond Fossil Fuels, a partner organization.

Namely, someone spilled paint on Toneva’s car and broke her window with a stone they threw into the house. She told Svobodna Evropa (RFE/RL) that local authorities are hostile to her because of her activism. The firm operating the nearby Bobov Dol facility condemned the attack.

  • 1
  • 2