by in News

EU waters down its 2040 climate target in runup to COP30 in Brazil

The Council of the European Union upheld the proposed 90% emissions cut target for 2040 ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP30 in Brazil, but with substantial workaround possibilities. In addition, the environment ministers failed to define the 2035 ambition, leaving the desired reduction in the amount of released greenhouse gases in a range of 66.25% to 72.5%.

Faced with declining competitiveness due to high energy prices and its strict climate and environmental standards, the EU is loosening its decarbonization goal. Following a marathon session in Brussels, the so-called Environment Council kept the desired greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2040 at 90%, against the 1990 level, to take it to the COP30 event in Belém, Brazil. However, the competent ministers making up the body allowed several important flexibilities to avoid a last-minute stalemate.

Namely, the Council of the EU approved an updated nationally determined contribution (NDC) of the 27-member bloc and individual states to submit it at the Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Political leaders are gathering tomorrow, while COP30 formally lasts from November 10 to 21.

Following the 2020 NDC and its 2023 update, the new one covers the period up to 2035.

Outsourcing climate improvements instead of domestic decarbonization

On the path to eliminating net emissions by 2050, the EU is sticking with its nominal 2040 goal. On the other hand, in the latest version, the environment ministers allow “an adequate contribution of high-quality international credits in a manner that is both ambitious and cost-efficient.”

In particular, five percentage points of the 90% can be met via emission cuts promised outside the EU, and governments would be allowed to outsource a further five points, Greenpeace warned. It means they would buy carbon credits abroad as offsets.

EU is counting on purchases of other countries’ carbon credits for offsets

“The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change [ESABCC] had called for emissions cuts of 90%-95% by 2040, and had stressed that this target must be for domestic reductions to climate pollution, not cuts outsourced to other countries. Environment ministers also agreed that the European Commission should reopen and water down the climate target in the case of high energy prices, a perceived negative economic impact or in light of technological advances. To reach a deal with reluctant countries, ministers also agreed to delay the start of the EU’s carbon market for pollution from cars and heating systems, extend pollution permits for heavy industry and exempt some ‘low-carbon’ fuels under the internal combustion engine phaseout,” the organization added.

The carbon market in question is the planned Emissions Trading System 2 (EU ETS 2). The Environment Council proposed to delay its establishment by a year, until 2028, and work on measures for a smooth launch.

“According to the ESABCC, only 16% of offsets have delivered genuine emissions reductions. But if they were high-quality offsets, they would be costly, and relying on them would divert investment from transforming the EU’s own industries, economy, and workers,” World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF) pointed out.

Indicative range for 2035 goal entirely below required efforts

The protracted discussions between the EU’s national governments also delayed the announcement of the EU’s indicative climate target for 2035, under the Paris Agreement. It is supposed to be submitted at the UN Climate Change Conference COP30.

“Ministers failed to agree a firm 2035 target, instead keeping a previously agreed range of 66.25% to 72.5% emission cuts, even the upper end of which is inconsistent with a credible pathway to the proposed 90% cut for five years later, undermining the EU’s position as a climate leader at COP30,” Greenpeace stressed.

Climate-competitiveness-independence tradeoff

The European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) is expected to discuss the matter soon. After a plenary vote, the institution would negotiate with the Council of the EU and European Commission.

“We need climate, competitiveness and independence. All three are crucial and going forward we need to ensure that one doesn’t come at the expense of the other. This morning, the environment and climate ministers of all member states reached a pragmatic, ambitious deal which ensures that,” said European Commissioner for Climate, Net-Zero and Clean Growth Wopke Hoekstra.

by in News

Greece to rely on carbon price, renewables potential in green hydrogen development

Despite early efforts to develop green hydrogen and its first regulatory framework, Greece finds itself on a steep curve.

The government has presented the first law on hydrogen and renewable gases in parliament. At the same time, refineries and other industries are working on projects that will determine green hydrogen’s cost-effectiveness.

However, a significant obstacle is the government’s unwillingness to support the new technology, either through subsidies or other financial instruments. The Ministry of Environment and Energy has specified that no upcoming technology would benefit from public funds. The goal is to maintain a low cost for the consumer during the energy transition.

According to Professor Pantelis Kapros from the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), it means hydrogen will have to rely almost exclusively on the price of carbon. As the European Union’s European Trading System (EU ETS) is about to enter its second phase in 2026, the price of carbon allowances is projected to rise steeply.

Even so, market participants estimate that a ton of carbon dioxide equivalent would need to cost EUR 140, two times more than today, to make green hydrogen competitive against grey hydrogen, which is produced from natural gas.

Exports and power prices added to the equation

Regardless, Greece sees an opportunity to produce and export green hydrogen. The reason is its high renewables potential and production. The ever-increasing photovoltaic capacity has caused an overabundance of energy during the day. More demand is needed to balance the system and hydrogen can provide a way out.

Tsafos: We want to become a supplier

The hope is that the low renewable energy cost, combined with potential interest in shipping hydrogen abroad, will justify long-term investments.

“Our view is that as long as the market is interested, we want to become a supplier,” Deputy Minister of Environment and Energy Nikos Tsafos said at the Hydrogen & Green Gases Forum in Athens.

A potential problem is that green hydrogen plants are not expected to be viable if they only produce during the day, when renewable energy prices are usually lower. “Ten hours of operation are not enough to support producers and there are also technical issues to solve,” said Dimitris Kardomateas, head of the Center for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving (CRES).

He also pointed to the average daily wholesale power price, as it is higher in Greece than in most other European markets. It should be noted that electricity makes up about 70% of the total operating cost of electrolyzers.

Biomethane considered more mature

On the other hand, biomethane is considered much easier to develop.  The technology depends less on power prices and also faces fewer technical hurdles. “Biomethane has a clear role, especially through its ability to enter the gas network, and we want to utilize it”, said Tsafos.

Gas distribution company Enaon EDA emphasized its readiness to include biomethane in its network. Its CEO Barbara Morgante noted that a study is underway to pinpoint the various existing and planned biomethane production plants around the country, as well as their proximity to Enaon’s network.

Biomethane is usually obtained by processing biogas to get methane of the same purity as in fossil gas. The renewable fuel can also be produced from clean hydrogen and CO2.