AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Main
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • News
  • EventsEvents
  • PublicationPublication
  • Contact Us
AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Main
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Sectors
  • News
  • EventsEvents
  • PublicationPublication
  • Contact Us
AEA-Albania Energy Association
  • Home Page
  • About Us
  • Sectors
  • Our Services
  • News
  • Contact Us
February 12, 2026
by AEA in Uncategorized

Next-Generation Geothermal Poised to Become Europe’s Mainstream Clean Power Option

Next-Generation Geothermal Poised to Become Europe’s Mainstream Clean Power Option

Technological progress is rapidly expanding the areas where geothermal electricity can be produced, strengthening its position as a cost-competitive and secure alternative to fossil fuels—including for fast-growing loads such as data centres. With today’s emerging methods, geothermal could already replace 42% of electricity generation from coal and gas plants in the EU, Ember found. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) could also provide a form of indirect storage for surplus solar and wind power.

In its report Hot Stuff: Geothermal Energy in Europe, Ember said advances in drilling and reservoir engineering are unlocking geothermal electricity across far wider parts of Europe. Once confined to a handful of favourable locations, geothermal is now positioned to scale from a niche “volcanic” resource to a more mainstream technology.

New geothermal technologies could replace 42% of EU’s fossil electricity, at costs comparable to coal and gas

New geothermal technologies could replace 42% of EU’s fossil electricity, at costs comparable to coal and gas

Ember’s latest figures indicate geothermal could replace 42% of the EU’s coal- and gas-fired generation for less than €100/MWh.

“Once restricted to a few geological hotspots like Iceland or Tuscany, modern geothermal is now cost-competitive with gas across much of the continent. As Europe seeks to slash emissions while meeting the energy demands of heavy industry and AI data centers, this untapped resource offers a clean, firm power supply that remains insulated from the price volatility of imported fossil fuels,” said Ember Policy Advisor Tatiana Mindekova, the report’s author.

Conventional geothermal historically depended on underground rock formations that were both hot and naturally permeable, enabling water at depth to circulate and transport heat. Despite this, geothermal’s global electricity output remains limited: 99 TWh in 2024, representing below 0.5% of worldwide generation.

Deeper, hotter—and less dependent on natural conditions

Over the past decade, progress in “next-generation” geothermal has reduced reliance on naturally occurring permeability—the open pores in rock that allow fluids to flow. New approaches can now create or enhance these flow pathways artificially.

While geothermal plants rarely operated deeper than three kilometers in the past, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are increasingly able to access heat from much deeper, hotter rock layers—often with little or no natural water or permeability.

These techniques, adapted from the oil and gas sector, allow a working fluid—typically water—to circulate through engineered pathways and extract heat.

Costs fall as flexibility rises

Ember noted that improvements in power conversion systems now allow electricity generation at lower temperatures. At the same time, well costs have fallen by 40% over the past decade.

The report also highlighted geothermal’s ability to operate flexibly. Reservoirs can be managed to indirectly absorb surplus wind and solar generation—primarily through increased pumping and injection—and later release stored thermal and pressure energy to produce additional electricity.

Beyond power, geothermal brines may offer a minerals opportunity. Ember pointed to the potential to extract valuable materials such as lithium directly from underground brines, with recovery rates of up to 95%, compared with around 60% from hard-rock mining, alongside far lower water use.

Cost competitiveness and growing global pipeline

Geothermal is already described as cost-competitive with fossil fuels in Europe. Ember put geothermal’s levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) at around $60/MWh, versus roughly $100/MWh for most fossil-fuel generation. LCOE reflects lifetime construction and operating costs.

Globally, by 2030, nearly 1.5 GW of new geothermal capacity is expected to come online each year—around three times more than in 2024. Ember said geothermal could meet up to 15% of growth in electricity demand by 2050.

Europe had 147 geothermal power plants operating in 2024, generating about 20 TWh from just over 3.5 GW—roughly one-fifth of global capacity. Turkey, Italy, and Iceland accounted for nearly all of Europe’s output.

Hungary leads EU potential below €100/MWh

Ember identified 43 GW of enhanced geothermal capacity in the EU that could be developed at costs currently below €100/MWh, translating to 301 TWh per year—equal to 42% of production in 2025.

43 GW of geothermal in the EU would cost less than gas-fired power

43 GW of geothermal in the EU would cost less than gas-fired power

Hungary stands out within the EU with 28.3 GW of potential below €100/MWh. When including projects with LCOE between €100/MWh and €200/MWh, Hungary’s total rises to 39.6 GW. Only France is higher overall, at 52.7 GW. Iceland was highlighted for exceptionally large potential—191.9 GW at up to €100/MWh.

Across the wider region tracked by Balkan Green Energy News, Turkey is also in the top tier, with 5.7 GW at up to €100/MWh and another 12.9 GW above that threshold.

In Southeast Europe, Ember estimated potential below €100/MWh at 838 MW in Romania, compared with 631 MW in Serbia and 148 MW in Croatia. Croatia also has 607 MW in the higher-cost segment, while Slovenia is at 168 MW, all in the more expensive range.

Data centers, policy gaps, and a race to scale

Drawing on recent US trends, Ember said geothermal could cost-effectively meet up to 64% of the expected increase in data center electricity demand by the early 2030s.

The report warned that Europe—despite being an early tester of next-generation methods—risks falling behind due to lengthy permitting and the lack of a unified EU strategy. In contrast, the US and Canada are scaling projects more aggressively through targeted policy incentives.

Ember also referenced a Stanford University study suggesting EGS can complement wind and solar and significantly reduce the volume of renewables and battery infrastructure required for a clean transition. The US Department of Energy expects costs to decline substantially by 2035, and the first major EGS project in the US—a 2 GW facility in Utah—was approved in October 2024.

December 19, 2025
by AEA in Uncategorized

solar-calculator

[solar-calculator]

December 16, 2025
by AEA in Uncategorized

solar-calculator

[solar-calculator]

August 9, 2016
by AEA in News, Uncategorized

Erdogan, Putin and the touchy Turkish Stream

0,,16429774_303,00The presidents of Russia and Turkey are expected to repair relations and revive a gas pipeline project at a meeting in St. Petersburg on Tuesday. There is, however, one key issue on the table, DW’s Andrey Gurkov writes.

The revival of the Turkish Stream pipeline project is expected to be the concrete outcome of the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in St. Petersburg on Tuesday. The presidents will also recommit to the construction of Turkey’s first nuclear power station, in Akkuyu, which is now severely behind schedule.

The main aim of this meeting, which was called at short notice, is to signal a thaw in relations betweenRussia and Turkey. In November 2015, there was a row over conflicting interests in Syria and the shooting down of a Russian bomber by Turkey’s air force. Putin and Erdogan will now be anxious to show their nations, the world and especially the European Union that their quarrel is over. They intend to send a message to Brussels, Berlin, Paris and, of course, Washington: We can be friends without you – and even against you.

The exchange of opinion and declarations of friendship will not be taking place on neutral terrain – on the fringe of a G20 meeting, for example. Erdogan, who apologized in June for the shooting down of the plane and the death of two airmen, will be meeting Putin in the city where the Russian president was born. This reinforces the impression that Putin has emerged from their short-lived conflict as the victor, both politically and economically. He wanted the Turkish Stream gas pipeline, and he’s going to get it.

But in what form? And at what price? This is where Erdogan could prove the victor. If the presidents decide to build only one pipeline along the route rather than two, it would be to Ankara’s advantage. Or to be precise: Moscow, and Gazprom in particular, would be at a disadvantage.

Substitute for another pipeline

For years, the Kremlin has made it a priority to put an end to the transit of Russian gas through Ukraine, from where it flows west to the European Union. But there is also a line that branches off southward. This line passes through Moldova, Romania and Bulgaria, and also supplies Turkey with Russian energy.

Initially, the pipeline through Ukraine was to be replaced by the South Stream, which consists of four strings with a total capacity of 63 billion cubic meters (82 billion cubic yards) per year. It was to run from the Russian port of Anapa along the floor of the Black Sea to Bulgaria and from there to Austria. However, the project contravened EU regulations.

And so, after a meeting with Erdogan in Ankara in December 2014, Putin suddenly announced that the Black Sea pipeline would be diverted toward western Turkey, where three of the four strings would continue on to the Greek border – the border with the main consumer of Russian gas: the European Union. This was the birth of the Turkish Stream.

Soon afterward, however, the project ground to a halt. All of a sudden Turkey wasn’t interested in the transit of large quantities of Russian gas anymore, and officials wanted only one string to cover domestic requirements. Then the jet was shot down, and for over half a year the project seemed to be dead in the water.

At Ankara’s insistence

No one is speaking of four strings anymore. But a single line with a capacity of 15.75 billion cubic meters would be the most expensive option for Gazprom – and therefore the least advantageous. The state-owned Russian company would have to spend several billion credit-financed dollars to lay a relatively small pipeline in the depths of the Black Sea and build all of the necessary infrastructure on the Turkish coast. And the sole purpose of this would be to replace an overland pipeline that already works perfectly well.

A second string would not, of course, make Turkish Stream cost-effective, but at least it would increase the turnover. Gazprom could then supply Greece and Italy via the planned Poseidon pipeline. However, during his recent visit to Moscow, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek spoke only of a single string. It doesn’t sound like Ankara is in the mood for compromise.

So, it may well be that, by being totally focused on the geopolitical goal of taking the transit of gas away from Ukraine, Putin is imposing a burden on Gazprom that will stretch the state-owned company to the absolute limit – and at a time of empty coffers. Gazprom would have to invest a disproportionate amount of money into the Black Sea for a single Turkish Stream pipeline and potentially delay the Nord Stream 2 pipeline across the Baltic, which would have an annual capacity of 55 billion cubic meters.

At Russia’s expense, Erdogan would get a brand new underwater pipeline that is not subject to any transit risk – and thus, in the long term, Turkey would get even cheaper gas, as the transit costs currently imposed by several countries along the route would no longer apply.

Furthermore, Erdogan would be assured enduring gratitude from Azerbaijan. The close regional ally is already laying the TANAP pipeline to Greece via Turkey, and it has absolutely no interest in a competing Russian project to supply the southern European Union.

November 25, 2015
by AEA in News, Uncategorized

Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries

Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European CountriesOn 24 November 2015, the 4th Summit of China and Central and Eastern European Countries (hereinafter referred to as “CEECs”) was held in Suzhou, China. Premier Li Keqiang of the People’s Republic of China, President Andrzej Duda of the Republic of Poland, Prime Minister Edi Rama of the Republic of Albania, Chairman of the Council of Ministers Denis Zvizdic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Prime Minister Boyko Borisov of the Republic of Bulgaria, Speaker of Parliament Josip Leko of the Republic of Croatia, Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka of the Czech Republic, Prime Minister Taavi Roivas of the Republic of Estonia, Prime Minister Orban Viktor of Hungary, Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma of the Republic of Latvia, Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevicius of the Republic of Lithuania, Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski of the Republic of Macedonia, Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic of Montenegro, Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic of the Republic of Serbia, Prime Minister Miro Cerar of the Republic of Slovenia, Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Economy, Commerce and Relations with the Business Environment Costin Borc of Romania and Deputy Prime Minister Lubomir Vazny of the Slovak Republic attended the meeting. They expressed appreciation and gratitude to China for the efforts it had made as the host country to ensure the success of the meeting. Representatives of other parties, including the EU, Austria and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, were present as observers.

Participants at the meeting (hereinafter referred to as “the Participants”) commended the substantial progress that had been made in the past year in the cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries (hereinafter referred to as “16+1 cooperation”), in particular in the implementation of the Belgrade Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries (see Annex), welcomed and supported the important agreement between the Chinese and EU leaders on establishing the China-EU Connectivity Platform, as well as on developing synergies between the Belt and Road initiative of China and the Investment Plan for Europe, and between 16+1 cooperation and China-EU relations. The Participants expressed their readiness to seize these opportunities and work together to further advance 16+1 cooperation.

The Participants jointly formulated and issued, on the theme of “New Beginning, New Domains, New Vision” , the Suzhou Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries.

1. The Participants support Latvia in hosting the 5th China-CEEC Summit in 2016.

2. The Participants welcome the Medium-Term Agenda for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries issued during the 4th China-CEEC Summit, and are ready to implement it in light of their respective realities, needs and priorities.

3. 16+1 National Coordinators’ Meetings will be held in China and Latvia respectively in 2016.

4. The Participants support the establishment of a mechanism of quarterly meetings between the Secretariat for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries (hereinafter referred to as “the Secretariat”), its member organizations and CEEC embassies in China. The Participants support more efficient use of the Secretariat’s website.

5. Cooperation on Connectivity

(1) The Participants note that the cooperation document on the Belt and Road initiative was signed between the governments of China and Hungary and that there is an interest to have similar documents between China and other CEECs, with a view to enhancing cooperation on regional connectivity.

(2) The Participants welcome the commencement of the regular express cargo railway transit from China to Poland. The Participants encourage and support similar links between China and other CEECs and appreciate the efforts assuring possibility that the goods could be transported in both directions. The Participants support the further development of the Eurasian Land Bridge and welcome the establishment of logistic centers in CEECs.

(3) The Participants appreciate the major progress that has been made in the modernization of the railway line connecting Budapest and Belgrade and welcome the joint efforts of the relevant parties for early completion of the project.

(4) The Participants welcome China, Hungary, Serbia and Macedonia in organizing the 2nd working group meeting and a workshop under the Framework Agreement on Cooperation in Facilitating Customs Clearance Among the Chinese, Hungarian, Serbian and Macedonian Customs in Budapest in 2016, streamlining customs clearance procedures for goods in transit and means of transport and increasing cooperation on customs clearance facilitation for the China-Europe Land-Sea Express Line.

(5) More CEEC customs are encouraged to take part in the third phase of the China-EU Smart and Secure Trade Lanes Pilot Project.

(6) The Participants welcome and support Serbia in leading the efforts to establish a China-CEEC association on transport and infrastructure cooperation and welcome the participation of relevant Chinese and CEEC institutions, businesses and organizations on a voluntary basis.

(7) The Participants welcome and support Latvia in leading the efforts to establish a China-CEEC secretariat on logistics cooperation and welcome the participation of relevant Chinese and CEEC institutions, businesses and organizations on a voluntary basis.

(8) The Participants welcome the relaunch of direct flights between Beijing and Budapest and the launch of direct flights between Beijing and Prague in addition to existing Beijing-Warsaw connection. The Participants support deepening civil aviation cooperation between China and more CEECs.

(9) The 1st China-CEEC Transport Ministers’ Meeting will be held in Riga, Latvia, in 2016.

6. Economic and Financial Cooperation

(1) The 2nd China-CEEC Ministerial Meeting on Promoting Trade and Economic Cooperation will be held in Ningbo, China, in June 2016.

(2) The China-CEEC Investment and Trade Expo will be held in Ningbo, China, in June 2016 during the China International Consumer Goods Fair.

(3) The 3rd Meeting of the China-CEEC Investment Promotion Agencies Contact Mechanism will be held in China in 2016.

(4) The Participants welcome and support Romania’s initiative of setting up a Center for Dialogue in energy-related projects. The 1st meeting of the Center will be organized in Romania in 2016.

(5) The Participants welcome and support the participation of Chinese and CEEC SMEs in the China International Small and Medium Enterprises Fair 2016.

(6) China will attend the Brno International Engineering Fair in the Czech Republic in 2016 as a partner country.

(7) The China Investment Forum will be held in the Czech Republic in 2016.

(8) The Participants welcome and support the organization of an economic forum focused on infrastructure, tourism and industrial capacity cooperation between China and CEECs, to be held in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, in the first half of 2016.

(9) Qualified CEEC financial institutions are welcomed to apply to be indirect participants in the RMB Cross-border Inter-bank Payment System (Phase One).

(10) The Participants welcome the ongoing work leading to the signing of a statement of cooperation on crisis management between the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the Czech National Bank and the signing of an MoU on regulatory cooperation between the China Banking Regulatory Commission and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority.

7. Agricultural and Forestry Cooperation

(1) The 11th China-CEEC Agrotrade and Economic Cooperation Forum will be held in China in 2016, in conjunction with the 2nd meeting of the China-CEEC Association on Promoting Agricultural Cooperation.

(2) An exhibition area will be set aside for top-quality CEEC agro-products at the 14th China International Agricultural Trade Fair to be held in Yunnan Province, China, in the second half of 2016.

(3) The Chinese side will create a free-of-charge exhibition space for top-quality CEEC wines and spirits at the National Agriculture Exhibition Center.

(4) The Participants welcome the signing or the work leading to the signing of the relevant protocols on quarantine of animal and animal-originated products to be exported to China between China and Serbia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Poland and Estonia respectively. The Participants support China and more CEECs in expanding trade of agro-products and food.

(5) The Participants support Slovenia in leading the efforts to establish a China-CEEC coordination mechanism for forestry cooperation. The 1st China-CEEC High-Level Meeting on Cooperation in Forestry will be held in Slovenia in May 2016.

(6) The Participants welcome China and CEECs in signing agreements on strengthening cooperation in water resources and agricultural irrigation.

8. Cooperation on Science, Technology and Health

(1) The 3rd China-CEEC Seminar on Innovation, Technology Cooperation and International Technology Transfer will be held in China in 2016.

(2) The Participants encourage and support the establishment of a virtual China-CEEC technology transfer center, and the role of the secretariat will be assumed by the relevant Chinese and Slovak institutions.

(3) The Participants support the environment protection authorities of China and CEECs in enhancing exchanges under the framework of 16+1 cooperation and discussing the possibility of cooperation with a third party.

(4) The 2nd China-CEEC Health Ministers’ Forum will be held in China in 2016.

(5) CEEC health professionals will be invited to visit China in 2016 and to participate in seminars on global health diplomacy, healthcare system reforms and health promotion, with a view to strengthening academic and professional exchanges.

(6) CEEC medical and health businesses will be invited to China for exhibitions on health services and medical devices, with a view to promoting cooperation in the medical industry.

9. People-to-People Contacts and Cultural Exchanges

(1) The Secretariat will continue to invite senior CEEC officials for a trip to China in 2016.

(2) The 4th China-CEEC Education Policy Dialogue and the 3rd meeting of China-CEEC Higher Education Institutes Consortium will be held in China in 2016.

(3) A China-CEEC forum on cooperation in the field of art and the 2nd China-CEEC Summer Dance Camp will be held in China in 2016.

(4) Famous CEEC artists and composers as well as artistic directors of international opera festivals in CEECs will be invited to visit China in 2016.

(5) The Participants support China and CEECs in carrying out joint projects on translation and publication of each other’s literary works. China welcomes CEECs to be the Country of Honor as a group at the Beijing International Book Fair in 2016.

(6) The 1st China-CEEC Cultural and Creative Industries Forum will be held in Belgrade, Serbia, in 2016.

(7) The 1st China-CEEC Experts’ Forum on Intangible Cultural Heritage will be held in Krakow, Poland, in 2016.

(8) The Participants welcome the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in leading the efforts to establish a China-CEEC think tanks network.

(9) The 4th China-CEEC High-Level Symposium of Thinks Tanks will be held in 2016.

(10) The Participants encourage and support mutual visits by Chinese and CEEC journalists in 2016.

(11) A China-CEEC seminar of sinologists will be held in 2016.

(12) The Participants welcome the organization of the Travel 2016 expo and the related professional conference in March 2016 in Budapest. China will participate in the expo as the Country of Honor. The Participants support the opening of the regional center of the China National Tourism Administration in Budapest.

(13) The 3rd China-CEEC High-Level Conference on Tourism Cooperation will be held in Croatia in 2016.

10. Cooperation at the Local Level

(1) The 3rd China-CEEC Local Leaders’ Meeting and the China (Hebei) International Economic and Trade Fair 2016 will be held in Hebei Province, China, in 2016.

(2) The 2nd working meeting of the China-CEEC Association of Provincial Governors will be held in Hebei Province, China, in 2016.

(3) The Participants encourage and support exchanges and cooperation between mayors of Chinese and CEEC capital cities.

Annex:

Implementation of the Measures of the Belgrade Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries

1. In January 2015, the customs clearance facilitation cooperation mechanism for the China-Europe Land-Sea Express Line among the Chinese, Hungarian, Serbian, Macedonian and Greek Customs was officially established.

2. From February to October 2015, the Chinese Art Festival was held in Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.

3. In March 2015, the launch ceremony of the Year of Promotion of China-CEEC Tourism Cooperation was held in Budapest, Hungary.

4. In March 2015, the 1st working group meeting under the Framework Agreement on Cooperation in Facilitating Customs Clearance Among the Chinese, Hungarian, Serbian and Macedonian Customs was held in Shanghai, China.

5. In April 2015, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs appointed the Special Representative for China-CEEC Cooperation.

6. In April 2015, the 1st meeting of the China-CEEC Business Council was held in Katowice, Poland.

7. In April 2015, the Riga High Level Conference on Transport and Logistics and the 3rd ASEM Transport Ministers’ Meeting was held in Riga, Latvia.

8. In May 2015, the 1st Customs Control Techniques Workshop for the China-Europe Land-Sea Express Line among the Chinese, Hungarian, Serbian and Macedonian Customs was held in Shanghai, China.

9. In May 2015, the 33rd Meeting of the Central Bank Governors’ Club of the Central Asia, Black Sea Region and Balkan Countries was held in Shanghai, China.

10. In May 2015, the 1st Meeting of China-CEEC Association of Provincial Governors was held in Hebei Province, China.

11. In May 2015, the Beijing-Budapest regular flight was launched.

12. In May 2015, heads of customs of China, Hungary, Serbia and Macedonia met in Xi’an, China, and signed the Cooperation Action Plan for 2015-2016.

13. In May 2015, China and Hungary signed an MoU on nuclear energy cooperation.

14. From May to June 2015, the Chinese Ministry of Culture organized Chinese performing arts organizations to purchase programs from Hungary, Serbia and Romania.

15. In June 2015, a delegation of CEEC journalists visited Zhejiang Province, Henan Province and Beijing, China.

16. In June 2015, the 1st China-CEEC Investment and Trade Expo was held in Ningbo, China.

17. In June 2015, the launch ceremony of the China-CEEC Association on Promoting Agricultural Cooperation and the 1st Meeting of Ministers of Agriculture was held in Sofia, Bulgaria.

18. In June 2015, the 1st China-CEEC Health Ministers’ Forum was held in Prague, the Czech Republic.

19. In June 2015, the 1st TCM center in the Czech Republic was established.

20. In June 2015, the cartoon series Panda and the Little Mole co-produced by China and the Czech Republic was premiered in the Czech Republic.

21. In July 2015, the 5th China-CEEC National Coordinators’ Meeting was held in Beijing, China.

22. In July 2015, a delegation of senior CEEC officials visited Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province and Beijing, China.

23. From July to August 2015, the 1st China-CEEC Summer Dance Camp was organized in Shaanxi Province, China.

24. In August 2015, Bank of China Prague Branch was opened.

25. From August to September 2015, the 2nd China-CEEC High-Level Conference on Tourism Cooperation was held in Bled, Slovenia.

26. In September 2015, the 10th China-CEEC Agrotrade and Economic Cooperation Forum was held in Budapest, Hungary.

27. In September 2015,the 3rd China-CEEC Education Policy Dialogue and the 2nd working consultation of the China-CEEC Higher Education Institutes Consortium were held in Warsaw, Poland.

28. In September 2015, the Beijing-Prague direct flight was launched.

29. In September 2015, the 2nd China-CEEC Seminar on Innovation, Technology Cooperation and International Technology Transfer was held in Bratislava, Slovakia.

30. In October 2015, an exhibition area dedicated to CEECs was created at the 11th China International Small and Medium Enterprises Fair in Guangzhou, China.

31. In October 2015, the Workshop on Customs Clearance Procedures of Transit Goods and Risk Management among the Chinese, Hungarian, Serbian and Macedonian Customs was held in Skopje, Macedonia.

32. In October 2015, a delegation of artistic directors of CEEC jazz festivals visited China.

33. In October 2015, the Seminar on Radio and Television Program Production for Central and Eastern European Countries was held in Shanghai and Hunan Province, China.

34. In October 2015, the 6th China-CEEC National Coordinators’ Meeting was held in Warsaw, Poland.

35. In October 2015, the 2nd China-CEEC Young Political Leaders’ Forum was held in China.

36. In November 2015, the 2nd China-CEEC Cultural Cooperation Forum was held in Sofia, Bulgaria.

37. In November 2015, the China Investment Forum was held in Prague, the Czech Republic.

38. In November 2015, China and Slovenia signed an MoU on the establishment of the China-CEEC coordination mechanism for forestry cooperation.

39. The 3rd China-CEEC High-Level Symposium of Think Tanks will be held in Beijing, China, in December 2015.

40. China and Romania will sign a new agreement on avoidance of double taxation as appropriate; China signed cooperation agreements on education with the Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania and Romania respectively; China signed cooperation agreements on quality inspection with Lithuania, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia respectively; China signed documents on cultural exchanges and cooperation with Bulgaria, Croatia, Latvia and Poland respectively; China signed with Romania an MoU regarding the relevant nuclear power project.

May 21, 2015
by AEA in Uncategorized

Lord Of Our Life And Our Salvation

Proin eget tortor risus. Curabitur arcu erat, accumsan id imperdiet et, porttitor at sem. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada.

Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui.

Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Mauris blandit aliquet elit, eget tincidunt nibh pulvinar a. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Pellentesque in ipsum id orci porta dapibus. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt.

May 21, 2015
by AEA in Uncategorized

God Uses Broken Things Beautifully

Proin eget tortor risus. Curabitur arcu erat, accumsan id imperdiet et, porttitor at sem. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada.

Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui.

Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Mauris blandit aliquet elit, eget tincidunt nibh pulvinar a. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Pellentesque in ipsum id orci porta dapibus. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt.

March 12, 2015
by AEA in Uncategorized

Azerbaijan’s SOCAR seeks company to check feasibility of Albania gas project

BP-SOCAR-Discuss-ACG-Fields-Development-in-AzerbaijanBAKU, March 9 (Reuters) – Azerbaijan state energy company SOCAR plans to announce a tender to find a company to conduct a feasibility study on Albania’s gas infrastructure plan as part of European efforts to reduce dependence on gas from Russia.

Albania and Azerbaijan signed a preliminary agreement in December to cooperate in development of an Albanian gas grid as the Balkan country leads construction of the European section of the project to bring Azeri gas to Europe from the Shah Deniz II field in the Caspian Sea.

The so-called southern corridor will bring gas to Turkey and Greece, as well to Italy via Albania and the Adriatic Sea.

“SOCAR will announce this tender in the next three months,” Murad Heydarov, adviser to SOCAR’s president, told Reuters.

“We should draft the feasibility study before the end of 2015, and if this project is considered effective, we will start Albania’s gasification project in March next year.”

Heydarov estimated the project’s cost at “several hundred million dollars”.

Azeri gas could reach southern Europe by the end of this decade through the proposed Trans Adriatic Pipeline and the Trans Anatolian Pipeline.

These pipelines would carry billions of cubic metres of gas a year from Shah Deniz II, one of the world’s largest gas fields, which is being developed by a BP-led consortium.

February 9, 2015
by AEA in Uncategorized

Russia and Turkey agree on Turkish Stream onshore route

Gazprom and Turkey have agreed the general route for the onshore section of the Turkish Stream pipeline. The first line of the 180 kilometer pipeline is expected to be completed by December 2016, according to company CEO Aleksey Miller.

“We have identified and put on the map also the on-ground passage of the Turkish Stream gas pipeline for further exploration and project work,” Miller told journalists on Sunday. “This is the key news.”

Landfall will be near the village of Kiyikoy, and a delivery hub for Turkish consumers will be close to the town of Luleburgaz. The pipeline will terminate on the Turkish-Greek border in the area of Ipsila.

Permission to carry out design and survey work in the new Turkish offshore section is expected soon.

Gazprom is ready to supply 47 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Europe via Turkish Stream, it said in a statement.

“We’ll direct the capacity of the gas pipe’s first line, 15.75 billion cubic meters, fully to the Turkish market. Considering the degree of readiness of the Russkaya compressor station and the larger part of the route, this time frame is absolutely reali

stic,” said Miller.

turkish-stream

On December 1 Gazprom and Turkey’s Botas Petroleum Pipeline Corporation signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of the gas pipeline from Russia to Turkey under the Black Sea.

Turkish Stream is an alternative to the South Stream project cancelled by Russia in December 2014 due to the EU’s unwillingness to support the 63 billion cubic meters capacity pipeline.

The route of Turkish Stream across the Black Sea will match much of that previously agreed for South Stream.

November 12, 2014
by AEA in Uncategorized

World Bank Financed Power Plant Threatens Albanian Canyon

A hydropower plant, which the Austrian company ENSO is building in the Lengarica River in southern Albania with financing by the IFC, threatens to ruin a famous canyon, BIRN can reveal.

Lengarica-2-BI

The heavy-duty trucks and earth-moving machinery working to construct a hydropower plant on the Lengarica River in southern Albania, close to the Greek border, look like alien imports in this pristine natural environment.

The river has cut a four-kilometre-long canyon through the limestone in the heart of the Hotova Pine national park, which is host to a series of thermal water springs, renowned for healing qualities, as well as a 17th-century bridge.

This ensemble of natural and cultural monuments enjoys the protection of the law. However, despite the law, and the area’s natural and cultural value, the government is allowing a hydropower plant to be built on the river, even though environmentalists fear it will severely damage the canyon.

The hydropower plant is being financed by the International Finance Corporation, IFC, the commercial arm of the World Bank, and is being constructed by an Austrian company, Enso Hydro, through a local subsidiary, Lengarica & Energy.

Documents obtained by BIRN and interviews with experts and government officials show that Lengarica & Energy’s initial application for a permit was rejected, owing to its negative impact on the Lengarica canyon and Hotova Pine national park.  

However, an environmental permit for the project was ultimately approved, apparently following political pressure.

The river canyon is a natural monument enjoying Category 1 protection status under Albanian law, “which does not allow for any sort of construction,” Zamir Dedej, head of Albania’s Institute for Nature Protection, recalled.

Enso Hydro admits that the plant is being constructed in a “sensitive” natural environment, but insists that the project will have no impact on the canyon itself.

The company says that while it is using water that flows in the canyon, it is not actually building inside it, in the Category 1 area.

It also underlines that it has received all the construction permits it needs from the government – and says it is up to the authorities to monitor compliance with the permits.

“We were aware that it was a sensitive area,” Lengarica & Energy director Wolfgang Kropfl, said.

The World Bank, which controls 20 per cent of the project through its investment in Lengarica & Energy, underlines that it reviewed the project under IFC Environmental Performance Standards criteria before deciding to finance it.

Albania’s centre-left government took power in September 2013 after its predecessor had already given the project the final go-ahead. In the face of protests by environmental groups, it has set up a taskforce to review the potential environmental impact.

The Lengarica canyon is considered an exceptional natural monument owing to its geological form and the thick vegetation, which are home many species of birds.

Together with the Benja thermal springs and the 17th-century Kadiu Bridge, the canyon has drawn a growing number of tourists to the Hotova Pine national park. They have become an important source of revenue for local residents.

“People in Albania act like there is no tomorrow; they don’t think about the future,” Gorgio Ponti, coordinator of the tourists’ hospitality centre in the nearby town of Permet, complained.

“It’s paradoxical that the Albanian government wants to develop tourism in the area – and then opts to build a power plant,” he added.

‘We made a good deal’:langarica

The Lengarica project first took life in 2008, when the government awarded a concession to a little-known Albanian company, Hasi Energji, to build two small hydropower plants on the Lengarica.

Hasi Energji, which had little capital, then sold the concession in a series of transactions to Enso Hydro, which was scouting the possibilities of hydro power in Albania.

The Austrian company specializes in small hydropower plants, with plants in Austria, Norway and Turkey, as well as Albania.

To finance the project, Enso Hydro sought financing from the IFC and a German bank. Construction began in the summer of 2013, despite the objections of local environmental groups.

Documents secured by BIRN show that Hasi Energji originally planned to build a complex of villas near the Benja thermal spring and applied for a permit with this in mind in 2006. 

However, the company then changed its mind and applied for a concession to build two small hydropower plants, Lengarica 1 and Lengarica 2, with an installed capacity of 3,700 and 2,500kW. It obtained a contract in 2008.

When Hasi Energji obtained the concession for the plants from the Ministry of Economy, it had capital assets of only 100,000 lek (€850), the minimum required by law to register as a company. Its only business experience was in the import and export of food materials.

Astrit Dhromaj,a former shareholder in the company, says the company never intended to develop the power plants itself. “We wanted to find a foreign company [to invest], which is what we did,” he told BIRN in a telephone interview.

In 2009, the Minister of Economy, Genc Ruli signed a contract with Hasi Energji, amending the concessionary agreement that the company had received earlier and reducing the number of power plants in the concession from two to one.

However, this single plant would have a much larger installed capacity than was originally planned, of 8,906 kW.

With the amended concession in its hands, Hasi Energji created a joint company with Enso Hydro in 2011, Lengarica & Energy, which first transferred 20 per cent of the shares to the Austrians and then sold them all the remaining shares for €800,000.

On August 3, 2011, Enso Hydro took control of all the shares of Lengarica & Energy.

Hasi Energji spent between 15,000 and 20,000 euro for the concession before selling it. “This was an important project and I think we made a good deal,” Dhromaj, the former shareholder in Hasi Energji, said.

Sudden change of heart:Lengarica-3-BI

After Enso Hydro took control of the company, the project to develop the larger single hydropower plant on the Lengarica moved forward.

The one problem was that since the time that Hasi Energji first obtained a concession and an environmental permit in December 2008, the government had declared the Hotova Pine area a national park.

This decision divided the park into four zones: a core area; an area of sustainable development; a recreational area; a traditional use area.

Following its acquisition of Lengarica & Energy, Enso Hydro developed a new project for the power plant.

Water would be taken in from the upper side of the canyon and deviated through a four-kilometre underground tunnel, which would then stretch another 3.75 kilometres above ground through tubes before reaching the power plant.

Of the total flow of the river at its peak, the power plant would use 8 metric cubes per second, leaving only 0.2 metric cubes per second to flow into the canyon, which the company says is enough to sustain its ecosystem.

When Lengarica & Energy bought the concession from Hasi Energji in 2011, it also had to reapply for a new environmental permit with the Ministry of Environment because the project now extended inside the boundaries of the Hotova Pine park.

Documents obtained by BIRN show that when Lengarica & Energy first applied for an environmental permit, the Ministry of Environment rejected it on October 4th, 2011.

The commission tasked with reviewing the project said building a power plant inside a national park protected by law was not feasible.

“Implementation of this project would cause considerable negative effects and damage the canyon in breach of the 2002 law on protected areas,” the ministry said.

“The deviation of the water flow will also damage the thermal springs near Benja at the end of the canyon,” it added.

The plant could “only be built if it used the water on the lower side of the canyon, after passing the Benja thermal water springs,” it continued.  

However, after Lengarica & Energy reapplied for an environmental permit, only two months later, without changing the project, the same ministerial commission changed its mind. It approved the plant’s construction on January 21st, 2012.

A former ministry official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told BIRN that the change of heart was the result of pressure applied by two MPs from the then ruling Democratic Party

“After I refused [to approve the project], I was fired directly on the order of the minister,” the official said.

The 2002 law on protected areas protects the Lengarica canyon from all development under Category I status. Article 5, section 2 of the law forbids all construction work in Category I areas.

However, Lengarica & Energy says this article of the law is not relevant to the project, which only involves diverting water away from the canyon, not construction work in the actual canyon.

 “If it [the work] was not allowed, the government should have not given us the environmental permit,” company lawyer Vilma Gjyshi said. “As we were granted the permit, we have a right to develop the project,” she added.

Wolfgang Kropfl, director of Lengarica & Energy, says the power plant only stretches into so-called Category 2 protected areas – and work can take place in Category 2 areas with the necessary permits.  “We are not working in the canyon,” Kropfl noted.

However, Sokol Abazaj, who worked as a consultant with Enso Hydro to develop the Lengarica project until 2012, told BIRN that Kropfl knew the project was controversial and had sought the area’s removal from the national park.  

“Lengarica & Energy asked for the area to be removed from the national park,” Abazaj maintained.

“This request was never approved by Albanian institutions, although Kropfl, administrator of Lengarica & Energy… repeated it more than once,” he added.

Abazaj claims that conflicts over the environmental consequences of the project became a source of dispute between him and Kropfl.

“I told him that in Albania… there are laws and regulations that cannot be breached,” Abazaj said. “It will come out one day in the media that there is real catastrophe there,” he added, referring to the project.

Kropfl dismisses the allegations. The company had no reason to seek the removal of the planned area of work from the national park, he said. “As the company, we did nothing about this. Why should we do any removing, or lobby for this?” he asked.

Lengarica-4-BIKropfl also argues that – by deviating water away from the canyon – the project may prevent the lower part of the river from flooding during times of peak flow.

The IFC, meanwhile, told BIRN that the project had been evaluated “according to the IFC Sustainability Framework and the IFC Environmental and Social Performance Standards, which promote the protection of biodiversity and the sustainable management of natural resources. 

“Based on information provided by the company, the Lengarica Project does not fall under protected area Category 1,” the IFC said. “The intake and tunnel fall under Category 2, and the… power house and part of substation fall under Category 3,” it added. 

Referring to the 2002 law on protected areas, it continued: “Everything is designed in compliance with Article 6, point 3 a) of the law.”

Article 6, point 3 a) of the law does indeed permit activities that “change the natural state of water reservoirs, springs, lakes and water basins”.  It says nothing about whether permission extends to such major projects as building hydropower plants, however.

While Lengarica & Energy insists that the plant is being built in the “sustainable development and traditional use” areas of the national park, the December 2008 government decision – which declared the Hotova Pine area a national park – underlined that only economic activity with a minimal impact on the environment should take place in the sustainable development area.

“In the sustainable development area, which serves as a buffer zone to the Category 1 core area, seasonal economic activities (grazing, collecting medicinal plants, secondary products from the forest), are allowed that do not have an impact on the ecological integrity of the ecosystem,” the decision read.

Contacted by BIRN, the ministries of Energy and Environment said they were awaiting the conclusions of a taskforce set up by both ministries, following the complaints by the local community and the environmental groups.

“We will analyze the conclusions of the joint taskforce in order to find out whether the concerns expressed by the community and civil society have any bases,” Energy Minister Damian Gjiknuri said. 

  • 1
  • 2

AEA – Albania Energy Association is a industry association dedicated to representing the interests of Albanian and West Balkan for energy producers and consumers. AEA works to advance the development and adoption of sustainable energy solutions in Albania and the Western Balkans, supporting the region’s transition toward a cleaner, more secure, and more competitive energy future. AEA is registered by decision of the Court of Tirana, DECISION NO. 3032, (VAT:L11827451K).

[email protected]

Address
Blv Zogu 1
Tirana
1057
ALBANIA

LinkedIn  |  Facebook
Events
May 25, 2022 Connecting Green Hydrogen Europe 2022
May 25, 2022 Energy Week Western Balkans 2022
Copyright © Albania Energy Association